To: Terpfen
He started off good, but then started talking about Neocons, and I just lost interest.
Not discussing the arrogant neocons in a article titled "The Corruption of Conservatism" would be like not talking about the elephant in the living room...even as it starts passing gas and chewing on the drapes.
14 posted on
02/01/2004 7:57:05 AM PST by
mr.pink
To: mr.pink
not discussing the arrogant neocons Only neocons are allowed to use the phrase, like Kristol. And only in glowing terms. I've had enough of these FDR republicans.
15 posted on
02/01/2004 8:02:06 AM PST by
steve50
("There is Tranquility in Ignorance, but Servitude is its Partner.")
To: mr.pink
Hey Mr Pink. Neocon/coms are liberals who became crossdressers to successfully consumate a Republican Party takeover. The more light you shine on them, the more they run into hiding.
22 posted on
02/01/2004 8:08:52 AM PST by
ex-snook
(Be Patriotic - STOP outsourcing American jobs.)
To: mr.pink
"Not discussing the arrogant neocons in a article titled "The Corruption of Conservatism" would be like not talking about the elephant in the living room...even as it starts passing gas and chewing on the drapes."
Sorry, but I think that Neocons are largely a straw man created by the left-leaning media to blame their hated Iraq war on. No one quite seems to be able to explain what a Neoconservative is, further resolving my belief that they don't exist.
Like I said, what if someone is for pre-emptive engagement but opposes the welfare state? You know, like me?
28 posted on
02/01/2004 8:17:26 AM PST by
Terpfen
(Hajime Katoki. If you know who he is, then just his name is enough.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson