[independentmind]

At any rate, I'd not deny a man his manhood. What occurs between a man and woman in private is not necessarily my business. That's when the issue of morality kicks in though, and it's not like the reds have a chance on this one.

Gee, that's awfully thoughtful of you. What about denying women their "womanhood"?

[Caipirabob]

Gee, that's awfully thoughtful of you. What about denying women their "womanhood"?

With respect, it's a generalization that I feel that China has implemented an inhumane policy via their "social engineering" in the enforcement of the 1 child 1 family rule. The obvious repercussions are becomming clear now, with the unatural ratio of men to women in their population. I'm stating this from the perspective of because of these policies, these men, within their own society, man never have the opportunity to find a suitable mate. All because someone thought it looked good on paper.

No, I do not condone Chinese prostitution. I am simply pointing out that they must feel it's probably one of the few viable alternatives to keep their government from being obliterated.

So, any "takers" on when the UN gets involved? Perhaps one of those "Humane" organizations? {crickets chirping...silence ensueses..}

[Caipirabob]

Also, believe me, I'm completely aware of what they do to women with the "enforced abortions" per their family policy. It's practically a Chinese holocaust. They pressure women heavily to become "fixed" after the first birth. Some families will actually kill the infant if it is a girl upon birth in hopes of eventually raising a child.

There is no end to the horrible atrocities being committed for the sake of this policy. Where I ask, is the voice of the "all-mighty U.N." or the Humane organizations on this? Even more, why are we doing business with these butchers?

There is much here to pursue in debate, it can really become emotional. Sometimes you just have to disconnect or it will break your heart.