[Owen]

>
Sorry - but I think a person can oppose GWB and not contribute to the death of a single child. We obviously disagree - but you have NO RIGHT to say my opposition is done with "the explicit intent of killing unborn babies".
>

If a negative result of your action is known a priori and you take the action nevertheless, there are few if any who would contort their thinking into a belief that negative intent was not present. You need to closely examine your thinking on this. You have spiraled yourself into a very bad place.

[Mr Rogers]

I believe the negative result - a Supreme Court nominee who supports abortion - is a certainty regardless. Therefor, I see no down side on this issue.

I would be more likely to support GWB because of our war against terrorists. On any other issue, I'm not seeing much difference. And I prefer gridlock to the unopposed slide towards socialism.