Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JUST SO YOU WONT FORGET WHO SAID WHAT!
Various Democratic Politicians | 30 Jan 2004 | Patriot

Posted on 01/30/2004 9:19:00 PM PST by Patriot1998

JUST SO YOU WONT FORGET WHO SAID WHAT!

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from USA but, what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face." Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S.Constitution and Laws, to take necessary actions, (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue a pace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, December 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members . It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime . He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan.23.2003


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1998; democrats; iraq; quotes; wmd; wmdquotes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 01/30/2004 9:19:01 PM PST by Patriot1998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Patriot1998
Yep. But the sheeple will forget. That's what the Left will count on.
2 posted on 01/30/2004 9:29:43 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Any day you wake up is a good day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patriot1998
Great compilation! I'm sending this to everyone I can think of. Thanks!
3 posted on 01/30/2004 9:38:24 PM PST by jwalburg (We CAN Question their Patriotism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
To think that most FReepers can agree with Rat's statements is somewhat encouraging. However, hope for consensus is out of reach.
4 posted on 01/30/2004 9:44:14 PM PST by endthematrix (To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Patriot1998
To be fair to Clinton, he has stood by Bush's decision to go to war (he hasn't made a bunch of [expletive] remarks about how Bush failed to find WMD)--unlike some of the other people who were "tough" on Saddam when that meant not going to war.
5 posted on 01/30/2004 9:45:33 PM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patriot1998
Dems on WMD - BUMP
6 posted on 01/30/2004 9:46:46 PM PST by polemikos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patriot1998
Bookmarked! Thanx bunches ... these will be useful in the coming weeks.
7 posted on 01/30/2004 9:49:33 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
To be fair to Clinton

I hate being fair to Clinton. It gives me a rash.

8 posted on 01/30/2004 10:08:47 PM PST by reformed_democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sergeantkill
ping
9 posted on 01/30/2004 10:49:49 PM PST by canis major (this space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patriot1998
bump
10 posted on 01/30/2004 10:55:49 PM PST by jonno (We are NOT a democracy - though we are democratic. We ARE a constitutional republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patriot1998
You need to post this on Dumocratic Underground .... LOL.
11 posted on 01/30/2004 11:01:37 PM PST by Rainmist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patriot1998
These quotes can not be repeated enough, b/c you won't ever see them reported by the liberal media.
12 posted on 01/30/2004 11:07:32 PM PST by shetlan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
Good grief, Clinton did everything he could to undermine this President and his handling of our response to 9/11. the ONLY reason why Clinton never condemned this President for attacking Saddam is because he is smarter than that Botox intoxicated loser John Kerry. Clinton knows everyone remembers his public statements and his half measures of launching hundreds of Cruise Missiles around the globe when ever he needed to divert attention from what ever corrupt campaign fund raising scandals he was involved in, or his countless unsavory liaison's he had with the assorted interns and Bimbo's in the Oval Office.

Bill Clinton has been trying to excuse his lack of response to the many attacks we suffered under his watch by saying that he would have done just as George W. Bush has if 9/11 happened on his watch, as he tries to tell us that Osama bin Laden was on his mind every day, and he did everything he could to bring him to justice.

Clinton's style of leading was to Poll the American people on where they wanted go, so he could lead them. WJC is a fraud

13 posted on 01/30/2004 11:22:09 PM PST by MJY1288 (WITHOUT DOUBLE STANDARDS, LIBERALS WOULDN'T HAVE ANY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Good grief, Clinton did everything he could to undermine this President and his handling of our response to 9/11

How? I'm not talking about his failures during the presidency, just about this one thing: how did Bill Clinton, in the aftermath of 9/11, attempt to undermine George Bush or the War on Terror?

14 posted on 01/30/2004 11:34:51 PM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
Have you forgotten Bill Clinton's trip to Europe when we were trying to get the U.N. on board. He met privately with Chirac, and Tony Blair and gave a speech that questioned Bush's motives. He also told the Press that he told president Bush on January 20th, 2001 that the biggest threat we faced was Osama bin Laden and terrorism. That never happened. How the hell would Clinton know what dangers we faced from Global Terrorism?, he only met with George Tenet 2 times the whole time he was POTUS, and very few times with FBI Director Louis Freeh (Sp?)

For Clinton to say he made every effort to capture Osama bin Laden is a bald face lie. 9/11 happened because of Bill Clinton and any support he might have attempted to show towards George W. Bush was for his own persaonal gain as well as his desperate attempt to spin his own legacy.

15 posted on 01/30/2004 11:51:54 PM PST by MJY1288 (WITHOUT DOUBLE STANDARDS, LIBERALS WOULDN'T HAVE ANY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
He also told the Press that he told president Bush on January 20th, 2001 that the biggest threat we faced was Osama bin Laden and terrorism

I remember something about that in the news. Did Clinton actually say this, or was this what one of his former flunkies said?

16 posted on 01/31/2004 12:03:00 AM PST by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
He never said anything of the sorts, how could he?, he hadn't been briefed by George Tenet for 2 years.

All Clinton ever did was to look over the daily threat assessment from the NIA that was compiled from the reports from the CIA, FBI and the DIA and the State Departments Intel gathering agency. He never called a meeting with George Tenet or Louis Freeh(sp?) to discuss a single daily threat assessment in his last 2 years in office.

17 posted on 01/31/2004 12:09:41 AM PST by MJY1288 (WITHOUT DOUBLE STANDARDS, LIBERALS WOULDN'T HAVE ANY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Ping!
18 posted on 01/31/2004 12:20:40 AM PST by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope
They'll just blame it on faulty intelligence.
19 posted on 01/31/2004 12:30:36 AM PST by Master of Orion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Patriot1998
Bump to mark my place
20 posted on 01/31/2004 12:38:38 AM PST by DeSoto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson