[massadvj]

I'd like to oppose liberlism. Here are my issues:

1. CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM. I am opposed to it, based on the limits it presents to free speech and the undemocratic advantages it provides for incumbents.

2. AMERICAN LIBERTIES. I'm for them. They've been eroded seriously over the past few years thanks to federal agents strip-searching innocent Americans everytime they travel, and the Department of justice depriving citizens of attorney and trial.

3. FOREIGN AID. Generally against it when not in the vital interest of American interests, including $15 billion in AIDS relief for Africa.

4. ENTITLEMENT GIVEAWAYS. Totally against, including $400 billion for a medicare prescription drug benefit for seniors.

5. TARIFFS AND TRADE BARRIERS. Against. Including tariffs on steel and agricultural products.

6. SUSIDIES. Against, including the recently-passed largest farm subsidy bill in American history.

7. FEDERAL MEDDLING IN EDUCATION. Against, including the largest increase in federal education spending in US history.

8. ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. Against. Need I say more?

9. FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY. For it. Against the double-digit increases in fedral spending, increase in the deficit, etc.

10. NATIONAL ENDOWMENT OF THE ARTS. Against federal funding and especially increases.

Oh, my gosh, it looks like the president I voted for is a liberal. Fool me once, shame on him. Fool me twice....

[Jaysun]

CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM, AMERICAN LIBERTIES, FOREIGN AID, ENTITLEMENT GIVEAWAYS, TARIFFS AND TRADE BARRIERS, SUSIDIES, FEDERAL MEDDLING IN EDUCATION, ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION, FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY, NATIONAL ENDOWMENT OF THE ARTS.

That's the problem that I've been having! I agree with you on those issues and there are a lot more that I'd like to see changed. You listed 10 things. My point is that there isn't enough time in the day to change 10 things. If we take them one at a time we can kill all of them. Out of your list, does any one thing ring out to you as especially needing change?

[Valin]

1. CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM. I am opposed to it, based on the limits it presents to free speech and the undemocratic advantages it provides for incumbents.

Ok here's a start.
If You Think Campaign Finance "Reform" Offends the First Amendment, Join This Effort
http://www.armorforcongress.com/index.php?submit=cfrad
Note: this is Congressman Billybob

Also
Hugh & Series, Critical & Pulled by JimRob
Special to FreeRepublic | 17 December 2003 | John Armor (Congressman Billybob)

This is nothing like the usual whine by someone whose post was pulled. JimRob pulled my previous thread for a good reason. "If direct fund-raising were permitted on FR, it would soon be wall-to-wall fund-raising."

So, let's start again correctly. This is about civil disobedience to support the First Amendment and challenge the TERRIBLE CFR decision of the Supreme Court to uphold a terrible law passed by Congress and signed by President Bush.

All who are interested in an in-your-face challenge to the 30- and 60-day ad ban in the Campaign Finance "Reform" Act, please join in. The pattern is this: I'm looking for at least 1,000 people to help the effort. I will run the ad, and risk fines or jail time to make it work -- AND get national support.

But there should be NO mentions of money in this thread, and not in Freepmail either. This is JimRob's electronic home, and we should all abide his concerns.

Put your comments here. Click on the link above, and send me your e-mail addresses. I will get back to you by regular e-mail with the practical details.

This CAN be done. This SHOULD be done. But it MUST be done in accord with JimRob's guidelines.


Fair enough?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1042394/posts



Update
I've already tested the idea of my in-your-face challenge ads, first in the print media and then deliberately illegal on TV, with certain editors I have a long relationship with. I could trust these two gentlemen, one in the print media and the other in the broadcast media, with a "heads up" on what I am planning. Both said they wanted to know, in advance, when I am about to do this.

The bottom line is clear. If I am willing to put my neck on the line, with the possibilities of a fine and jail time, THAT effort will put CFR back on the front page in all media. And that is part of the point. There's not much value of going in-your-face against the enemies of the First Amendment unless the press takes up the story and spreads the word. It is now clear they will do exactly that.

Update 2
QUICK PROGRESS REPORT, ANSWERING A SUPPORTER'S QUESTION:
We have about 15% of the needed 1,000 sign-ups.

Spread the word, direct folks to the front page link on my website.

Google-bomb the phrase "anti-CFR" directing readers to that page and link. (We're already #2 and #4 on Google.)

Target date is now August, since the NC primary looks to be put back to September. (Remember, the ad isn't illegal until the 29th day before the election.)


Cordially,

John / Billybob


Note if you are interested in more on this please contact myself(valin) or Congressman Billybob

[34512a]

Is there a difference between a protective tariff and a revenue tariff?

[Consort]

Here are my issues:

The next Republican President might resolve your ten problems; the next Democrat President won't resolve any of them, but will create a few additional problems for you; third parties are a joke and are for cut-and-run quitters who want to split the conservative power base.