To: rabidralph
Yikes! Is that what they were talking about on the radio yesterday?
Guess I need to turn on the television. I had no idea the whale was that big.
To: hellinahandcart
"Defendant GWB has purported to the American People, this Court and the Plaintiff that the infamous attacks of 911 were directly masterminded by Osama bin Laden and his Al Qaeda Network terrorists (hereinafter OBL), almost immediately after the attacks. Yet, Defendant GWB has not been forthright and honest with regard to his administrations pre-knowledge of the potential of the 911 attacks...
and Plaintiff seeks to compel Defendant GWB to justify why her husband Louis Neil Mariani died on 911. Plaintiff believes Defendant GWB is invoking a long standard operating procedure of invoking national security and executive privilege claims to suppress the basis of this lawsuit that Defendant GWB, et al., failed to act and prevent the 911 attacks. This Court must see through this and Plaintiff argues from the onset, the reasons why 911 occurred are no longer a national security risk, but, a national security disgrace and tragedy. How can somebody say this in legal documents? Isn't this slander or libel?
22 posted on
01/30/2004 5:26:37 AM PST by
sauropod
(Better to have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson