Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Do You Want to See the Actual Judiciary Committee Memos?
Coalition for a Fair Judiciary ^

Posted on 01/29/2004 12:10:34 PM PST by ConservativeGadfly

Go to this website: www.fairjudiciary.com

Click on "The Collusion Memos"

Read them and weep.


TOPICS: Announcements; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: estradamemo; judiciarycommittee; memogate; naacpmemo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
There is enough material in these memos for MONTHS of op-eds and talk radio chatter.

Not to mention an Ethics Committee investigation in the Senate on INFLUENCE PEDDLING, among other ethical violations.

1 posted on 01/29/2004 12:10:35 PM PST by ConservativeGadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGadfly
BUMP
2 posted on 01/29/2004 12:14:26 PM PST by ConservativeGadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGadfly
Rush just did a lovely rant on the memos.
3 posted on 01/29/2004 12:15:35 PM PST by mathluv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGadfly
I saved them all,. thanks for the post.
4 posted on 01/29/2004 12:18:48 PM PST by joyce11111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGadfly
Rush just finished commenting upon the Repubs' rolling over on these memos. If he is correct, WHY are the Repubs making nice-nice and agreeing not to make an issue of the Dems' outrageous interfering with the judicial nomination process??
5 posted on 01/29/2004 12:41:31 PM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGadfly
Boy oh boy ... those things are amazing.

As for why the GOP is rolling over, it's obvious. No doubt they've had their own little war room sessions over the years with our own special interest groups.

6 posted on 01/29/2004 12:48:56 PM PST by The G Man (Wesley Clark is just Howard Dean in combat boots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGadfly
Cross-linking:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1015980/posts
MemoGate- sedition, slander-- or something worse?
Various FR links | 11-06-03 | The Heavy Equipment Guy


 

7 posted on 01/29/2004 12:50:11 PM PST by backhoe (The 1990's? The Decade of Fraud(s)... the 00's? The Decade of Lunatics...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
WHY are the Repubs making nice-nice and agreeing not to make an issue of the Dems' outrageous interfering with the judicial nomination process??

Maybe because they were committing a felony by accessing them without authorization. I predicted the good ol' boys club would put party aside and come together in self defense.

8 posted on 01/29/2004 12:51:37 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
If he is correct, WHY are the Repubs making nice-nice and agreeing not to make an issue of the Dems' outrageous interfering with the judicial nomination process??

Maybe because they know one of their staffers broke the law to get the info? If so, they have less leverage. At least that would explain it.
9 posted on 01/29/2004 1:02:12 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGadfly
Bttt
10 posted on 01/29/2004 1:04:42 PM PST by DoctorMichael (Thats my story, and I'm sticking to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
What law was broken?
11 posted on 01/29/2004 1:05:58 PM PST by diotima (WHACPACSACPAC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
fyi
12 posted on 01/29/2004 1:08:29 PM PST by jla (http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
WHY are the Repubs making nice-nice....

Because republicans are pussies.
13 posted on 01/29/2004 1:11:03 PM PST by axxmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGadfly
Bush isn't conservative enough, let's give the dems more power. We can count on them to do the right thing..........................
14 posted on 01/29/2004 1:14:31 PM PST by OldFriend (Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: diotima
Good question. With all the furor I assumed it was against the law for staffers to hack into computers (assuming they did). Maybe it's just an ethical violation if it happened. It must be awfully serious the way these dems are treating it! :-)
15 posted on 01/29/2004 1:26:15 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
No law was broken.

No ethics rule was violated.

They were on an open server.

And p.s., the Dems could read the Reps emails and memos too. The difference? The Reps weren't committing ethical violations and documenting them in memos.
16 posted on 01/29/2004 2:08:35 PM PST by ConservativeGadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
There wasn't any hacking. Hacking implies breaking down firewalls and busting through passwords. This was a shared server, open for anyone on the committee to see.
17 posted on 01/29/2004 2:09:54 PM PST by ConservativeGadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Yes, backhoe. Been mighty convenient for the Dems to avoid the subject of the content of the judiciary memos AS WELL AS the intelligence memos, eh?

And the Reps have swallowed the bait hook, line and sinker.
18 posted on 01/29/2004 2:12:28 PM PST by ConservativeGadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeGadfly
No law was broken. No ethics rule was violated. They were on an open server. And p.s., the Dems could read the Reps emails and memos too.

You've piqued my curiosity and admit to not being up-to-speed on this. Are you saying these idiots have folders on shared servers that are not password-protected and everyone can read everyone's memo's and documents? I find that hard to swallow.
19 posted on 01/29/2004 2:15:03 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
Yes. That is exactly what I am saying.

There is one server in the Senate Judiciary Committee. When Leahy took over after Jeffords jumped ship, he fired the old IT guys and brought in his own. Who stupidly configured the server so that the folders on the server could be opened by anyone.

When the problem was discovered, the Republicans told the IT guy the problem and he chose to do nothing about it.

So yes. It was an open server.

There was no hacking. There was no stealing. It was just there.

And so cleverly, the Dems started screeching about how the memos were leaked to avoid the subject of what was in the memos. And Hatch pulled the trigger when confronted by the hysterical Dems and referred the matter to the Sergeant at Arms, who is, by the way, a Gore contributor.

Starting to get the picture?
20 posted on 01/29/2004 2:41:23 PM PST by ConservativeGadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson