Skip to comments.
Do You Want to See the Actual Judiciary Committee Memos?
Coalition for a Fair Judiciary ^
Posted on 01/29/2004 12:10:34 PM PST by ConservativeGadfly
Go to this website: www.fairjudiciary.com
Click on "The Collusion Memos"
Read them and weep.
TOPICS: Announcements; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: estradamemo; judiciarycommittee; memogate; naacpmemo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
There is enough material in these memos for MONTHS of op-eds and talk radio chatter.
Not to mention an Ethics Committee investigation in the Senate on INFLUENCE PEDDLING, among other ethical violations.
To: ConservativeGadfly
BUMP
To: ConservativeGadfly
Rush just did a lovely rant on the memos.
3
posted on
01/29/2004 12:15:35 PM PST
by
mathluv
To: ConservativeGadfly
I saved them all,. thanks for the post.
To: ConservativeGadfly
Rush just finished commenting upon the Repubs' rolling over on these memos. If he is correct, WHY are the Repubs making nice-nice and agreeing not to make an issue of the Dems' outrageous interfering with the judicial nomination process??
5
posted on
01/29/2004 12:41:31 PM PST
by
pabianice
To: ConservativeGadfly
Boy oh boy ... those things are amazing.
As for why the GOP is rolling over, it's obvious. No doubt they've had their own little war room sessions over the years with our own special interest groups.
6
posted on
01/29/2004 12:48:56 PM PST
by
The G Man
(Wesley Clark is just Howard Dean in combat boots)
To: ConservativeGadfly
7
posted on
01/29/2004 12:50:11 PM PST
by
backhoe
(The 1990's? The Decade of Fraud(s)... the 00's? The Decade of Lunatics...)
To: pabianice
WHY are the Repubs making nice-nice and agreeing not to make an issue of the Dems' outrageous interfering with the judicial nomination process?? Maybe because they were committing a felony by accessing them without authorization. I predicted the good ol' boys club would put party aside and come together in self defense.
To: pabianice
If he is correct, WHY are the Repubs making nice-nice and agreeing not to make an issue of the Dems' outrageous interfering with the judicial nomination process??
Maybe because they know one of their staffers broke the law to get the info? If so, they have less leverage. At least that would explain it.
To: ConservativeGadfly
Bttt
10
posted on
01/29/2004 1:04:42 PM PST
by
DoctorMichael
(Thats my story, and I'm sticking to it.)
To: plain talk
What law was broken?
11
posted on
01/29/2004 1:05:58 PM PST
by
diotima
(WHACPACSACPAC)
To: Mia T
fyi
12
posted on
01/29/2004 1:08:29 PM PST
by
jla
(http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com)
To: pabianice
WHY are the Repubs making nice-nice....
Because republicans are pussies.
13
posted on
01/29/2004 1:11:03 PM PST
by
axxmann
To: ConservativeGadfly
Bush isn't conservative enough, let's give the dems more power. We can count on them to do the right thing..........................
14
posted on
01/29/2004 1:14:31 PM PST
by
OldFriend
(Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
To: diotima
Good question. With all the furor I assumed it was against the law for staffers to hack into computers (assuming they did). Maybe it's just an ethical violation if it happened. It must be awfully serious the way these dems are treating it! :-)
To: plain talk
No law was broken.
No ethics rule was violated.
They were on an open server.
And p.s., the Dems could read the Reps emails and memos too. The difference? The Reps weren't committing ethical violations and documenting them in memos.
To: plain talk
There wasn't any hacking. Hacking implies breaking down firewalls and busting through passwords. This was a shared server, open for anyone on the committee to see.
To: backhoe
Yes, backhoe. Been mighty convenient for the Dems to avoid the subject of the content of the judiciary memos AS WELL AS the intelligence memos, eh?
And the Reps have swallowed the bait hook, line and sinker.
To: ConservativeGadfly
No law was broken. No ethics rule was violated. They were on an open server. And p.s., the Dems could read the Reps emails and memos too.
You've piqued my curiosity and admit to not being up-to-speed on this. Are you saying these idiots have folders on shared servers that are not password-protected and everyone can read everyone's memo's and documents? I find that hard to swallow.
To: plain talk
Yes. That is exactly what I am saying.
There is one server in the Senate Judiciary Committee. When Leahy took over after Jeffords jumped ship, he fired the old IT guys and brought in his own. Who stupidly configured the server so that the folders on the server could be opened by anyone.
When the problem was discovered, the Republicans told the IT guy the problem and he chose to do nothing about it.
So yes. It was an open server.
There was no hacking. There was no stealing. It was just there.
And so cleverly, the Dems started screeching about how the memos were leaked to avoid the subject of what was in the memos. And Hatch pulled the trigger when confronted by the hysterical Dems and referred the matter to the Sergeant at Arms, who is, by the way, a Gore contributor.
Starting to get the picture?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
