Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. plans Al Qaeda offensive (in Pakistan). (Capture Bin Laden?)
Chicago Tribune ^ | 1/28/04

Posted on 01/28/2004 6:00:38 AM PST by areafiftyone

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 last
To: swarthyguy
Looks like a whole invisible war taking place right under the noses our intrepid newshounds.

There is an invisible war going on...and our newshounds are stuck on the Michael Jackson case.

121 posted on 01/29/2004 1:42:53 PM PST by Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Dog; Coop; swarthyguy
"Coop you ever been bird hunting? I think what we have here is a bit of disinformation on our part..."
You may be correct that part of the plan behind these stories is directed at flushing the prey, but for at least a couple of reasons, I don't think that's the main purpose behind the recent series of stories about joint Paki/U.S. operations.

First, the President is not only the Commander in Chief of the armed forces, he's also the political leader of this country, and in that capacity there is a practical necessity to keep the "troops" (us) up to speed on major developments that have significant upsides and downsides and not spring them on us after the fact with a "oops, did I forget to mention..."!

One of those upsides is, if this Pakistan operation turns out OK, we could well end up capturing bin Laden, Zawahiri and Omar. However the big downside is that, if it goes wrong, al Qa'ida could well end up in possession of Pakistan's nukes (and that would be the mother of all "aw shucks").

In other words, I think these stories were directed primarily as a heads up to the American people (albeit, a low key heads up).

The second reason I don't think that this is primarily directed at flushing the prey, is that al Qa'ida, et al, already know we are involved in operations inside Pakistan because we've been doing that for over two years now. The only thing changing is the tempo and the stakes. But al Qa'ida already know this (heck, is was al Qa'ida that raised the stakes by going after the bait (the nukes)), hence this story is no surprise to them.

I will post more below about some info I found about our past two years of operations inside Pakistan.

--Boot Hill

122 posted on 01/29/2004 9:24:54 PM PST by Boot Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Dog
"he said there is no way the Pentagon would tip our hand like this on a pending operation"
We didn't tip our hands, because it has been an ongoing operation for some time now. More about that below.

--Boot Hill

123 posted on 01/29/2004 9:27:59 PM PST by Boot Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Dog; swarthyguy; Coop
US to get THREE Pakistan Air Bases (This is the original, non-Google, source)
The news story at that link is from late Sept, 2001 and discusses three America airbases inside Pakistan. To follow along with this info...

open this Map of Pakistan in another window.

I did some searching on the above airbases and found that they have been continuously active since the date of that news story. Moreover, I found other credible internet references that adds three more currently active U.S. airbases to those in your news story, and dating from the same period. The only thing I can piece together to make sense of what we've been reading in FR threads lately, is that the U.S. must have first forced al Qa'ida and Taliban forces into Pakistan to destabilize it so that Musharraf would be forced to let us in to Pakistan to help clean house. On top of that, it appears we are using the Paki nukes to bait the trap. But I still want to know what are fall-back plan is for those nukes in case our plan fails and the mouse actually steals the cheese. Are we sitting on the nukes in Pakistan? If so, where are they located?

When checking out where the U.S. bases are located in Pakistan, I cross-referenced Pakistan's underground nuclear tests and discovered that our base at Dalbandin is located only 70 klicks (40 miles) west of the Ras Koh mountains, site of the 1998 nuclear weapons test. From my review, this is the most likely site for the Paki nuke stockpile.

BTW, the Kohat airbase, up by Tora Bora, also stands out. Of all U.S. bases in Pakistan, there is less information about our operations out of this base than any other base...which of course makes me very suspicious. But I suspect the secrecy has more to do with the nature of the operations conducted out of there, rather than because the Paki's store their nukes there.

Here are a several references to those additional airbases. They come from John Pike's globalsecurity.org (NO DEBKA JOKES, PLEASE!!!). However, it is easy to Google other sites that substantiate what pike's website says about these bases...

Dalbandin
Pasni
Jacobabad

(If you have problems loading any globalsecurity.org pages, let me know.)

One last thought for those among us not getting enough excitement in their lives. The Pakistan International Airlines schedule shows that they regularly fly into Dalbandin, Kohat, Jacobabad, Quetta (Shamsi) and if you've really got a really big pair hanging, you can even fly into Gilgit. Here's the link for airline and hotel reservations (don't forget to check out the all-goat floorshow at the Al Haman Hotel while you're in Dalbandin, LOL!)

Pakistan "International" Airlines

(And don't forget to ask for your "frequent terrorist flyer miles".)

--Boot Hill

124 posted on 01/30/2004 12:15:27 AM PST by Boot Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Boot Hill
BUMP> Thanks.

Was trying to remember the names Dalbandin and Pasni.

One or both of these were used as a staging point for the entry into Kandahar by the Marines. There was a major article about that.


Hadn't heard of Shamsi or Rajanpur at all.
125 posted on 01/30/2004 10:02:37 AM PST by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Boot Hill; swarthyguy
From your link (Boot Hill):

The only thing I can piece together to make sense of what we've been reading in FR threads lately, is that the U.S. must have first forced al Qa'ida and Taliban forces into Pakistan to destabilize it so that Musharraf would be forced to let us in to Pakistan to help clean house. On top of that, it appears we are using the Paki nukes to bait the trap. But I still want to know what are fall-back plan is for those nukes in case our plan fails and the mouse actually steals the cheese. Are we sitting on the nukes in Pakistan? If so, where are they located?

When checking out where the U.S. bases are located in Pakistan, I cross-referenced Pakistan's underground nuclear tests and discovered that our base at Dalbandin is located only 70 klicks (40 miles) west of the Ras Koh mountains, site of the 1998 nuclear weapons test. From my review, this is the most likely site for the Paki nuke stockpile.

You guys are all a treasure.

126 posted on 02/07/2004 5:27:56 PM PST by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
He's worm food.
127 posted on 02/07/2004 5:30:49 PM PST by macrahanish #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson