[Sabertooth]

Because there was a settlement before it went to trial.

Understand something: both sides settled.

Your excerpts are a pain. What's your objection to proclaiming that you think you know better than every other poster here about how fair use applies, and putting "another excerpt by quidnunc" in the headline?

How many times have other posters had to follow through for you and post the article in it's entirety on your threads, because you've been too precious to do it yourself?

Have you ever seen any of them called on it by the FR PTBs?

[quidnunc]

Sabertooth wrote: How many times have other posters had to follow through for you and post the article in it's entirety on your threads…

Never.

If they did that it's because they wanted to, not because they had to.

Sabertooth wrote: Understand something: both sides settled.

You understand something; if someone has to fly back and forth between the Midwest and California and hire a lawyer because they've been named as a party to a federal lawsuit then it's not going to be me if I have any say-so.

And this is what will be required regardless of the eventual outcome of the suit.

The expenses would be ruinous.

I'm not going to be bankrupted just so you don't have to open a few links here and there.