Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judges:Why Was Pervert Free?
Boston Herald ^ | 01/22/2004 | Dave Wedge and Jessica Heslam

Posted on 01/22/2004 7:42:46 AM PST by Redcoat LI

Edited on 01/22/2004 8:21:36 AM PST by Sidebar Moderator. [history]

Judges: Why was pervert free? By Dave Wedge and Jessica Heslam Thursday, January 22, 2004

Two of the state's top judges are calling for a probe into why probation officials allowed a sexual predator now accused of killing a Woburn mom and her daughter to remain free, despite repeated violations.

``I will make a formal inquiry,'' Justice Suzanne Delvecchio, head of the state's superior courts, said yesterday of the Michael Bizanowicz case.

Justice Samuel Zoll, head of the state's district courts, said he too is going to investigate why Bizanowicz apparently slipped through the cracks.

``Our involvement appears to be a narrow one,'' Zoll said. ``I'm going to familiarize myself with (the case).''

The state Department of Probation is ``currently reviewing this matter,'' said spokeswoman Coria Holland, who would not say if any action has been taken against Bizanowicz's Lowell probation officer, Claire Fogg.

Fogg did not return a call yesterday.

Bizanowicz, who is charged with the brutal slayings of Joanne and Alyssa Presti, served two years in jail and was put on five years probation after pleading guilty in 1998 to repeatedly drugging and raping a young boy and girl.

Prosecutors say Bizanowicz, who was released from jail in March 2001, violated his probation at least four times by failing to register as a sex offender, being arrested for forging a Percocet prescription, failing to notify probation of the arrest and failing to pay a probation service fee. Classified as a Level 3 sex offender - considered the most likely to reoffend - Bizanowicz also skipped out on sex offender treatment, authorities say.

A hearing on the alleged probation violations was slated for Feb. 3 in Lowell Superior Court - nearly eight months after his June 17, 2003, arrest in Woburn for forging a prescription. It was unknown yesterday when that hearing date was scheduled.

Under state law, a new arrest is a probation violation. It is the probation officer's decision whether to file charges.

Several court officials said yesterday that probation officers often wait until the new case is decided before charging the offender with a violation, especially when new charges are considered minor.

``Obviously any new offense of a sexual nature would have triggered something immediately,'' Delvechhio said. ``Decisions in this case were perhaps based on the offense in the district court.''

Bizanowicz's prescription forgery case was pending at the time of the murders. Despite his rap sheet, which dates back to 1981, and the alleged probation violations, Woburn District Court Judge George Sprague released him on $300 bail, an amount agreed upon by prosecutors and Bizanowicz's lawyer. Sprague refused comment yesterday.

Woburn police Chief Philip Mahoney said any Level 3 sex offender who breaks the law or violates probation should immediately be locked up.

``They need to be held to the highest standard,'' Mahoney said. ``They are a ticking time bomb and we don't know when they are going to go off.''

Delvecchio, who oversees the Superior Court probation department, said she is sending a letter to probation commissioner John J. O'Brien requesting an investigation. The judge defended the department, however, pointing out that officers sent out four surrender notices to Bizanowicz and had scheduled a hearing.

``Our probation department did work. They were bringing him in,'' she said. ``Unfortunately, (the Woburn murders) occurred before the hearing.''

Prosecutors say Bizanowicz entered Presti's Totman Road home on Jan. 4 or 5, gagged her with a towel, tied her up and raped her before beating her in the head and repeatedly stabbing her in the neck. Alyssa, who is the 12-year-old daughter of ex-Boston Bruin John Carter, apparently witnessed the attack and was chased upstairs by Bizanowicz, who slashed her throat, prosecutors said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: pervert

1 posted on 01/22/2004 7:42:46 AM PST by Redcoat LI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Redcoat LI
Bizanowicz, who is charged with the brutal slayings of Joanne and Alyssa Presti, served two years in jail and was put on five years probation after pleading guilty in 1998 to repeatedly drugging and raping a young boy and girl.

Two freaking years?! And to make matters worse, in MA, I'm sure the victims did not have the proper means of protecting themselves, like a HAND GUN! Those judge are MASSholes for sure.

2 posted on 01/22/2004 7:48:37 AM PST by leadpencil1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpencil1
Sex offenders -- especially "Class 3" sex offenders -- should be neutered. Even if they're never going to get out of prison. Which they shouldn't, anyway.
3 posted on 01/22/2004 7:52:47 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: leadpencil1
It's important that judges be held responsible for their irresponsible actions.
4 posted on 01/22/2004 7:53:02 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: leadpencil1
Good to see someone on the Mass bench woke up.
5 posted on 01/22/2004 7:53:17 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Good to see someone on the Mass bench woke up.

Expect to see them censured. Boston Globe will surely defend the perp. After all, these are simply life-style choices and we shouldn't be intolerant of those who march to different drummers.

6 posted on 01/22/2004 7:57:17 AM PST by Moosilauke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Neutered? No way. Execute them. Death ends recividism, permanently.
7 posted on 01/22/2004 7:57:29 AM PST by 7.62 x 51mm (Dogs have masters; Cats have staff...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Redcoat LI
Bill Clinton is still running loose also.
8 posted on 01/22/2004 7:57:45 AM PST by Piquaboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcoat LI
I'm sure glad there were no guns within easy reach of the 12-year-old, because as Sarah Brady always says, bringing a gun to a violent situation just makes it more violent.
9 posted on 01/22/2004 7:58:44 AM PST by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcoat LI

Perp

10 posted on 01/22/2004 8:02:42 AM PST by leadpencil1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcoat LI
Classified as a Level 3 sex offender - considered the most likely to reoffend ; and this piece of useless crap was only given 2 years?
11 posted on 01/22/2004 8:08:43 AM PST by MissEdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcoat LI
In Massachusetts, law-abiding gun owners may not move without notifying local and state police, but convicted sex offenders are not required to give the same notification. That's Massachusetts -- a cesspool of feel-good Kennedy pustulence.
12 posted on 01/22/2004 8:17:58 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissEdie
Bizanowicz, who is charged with the brutal slayings of Joanne and Alyssa Presti, served two years in jail and was put on five years probation after pleading guilty in 1998 to repeatedly drugging and raping a young boy and girl.

If he plead guilty to this charge, I'd bet it was a plea bargain.

13 posted on 01/22/2004 8:18:44 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Not good enough. Amputate and lobotomize. Then there'll be no more trouble. Seriously.
14 posted on 01/22/2004 8:26:21 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
I can't disagree with you.
15 posted on 01/22/2004 8:31:47 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: leadpencil1
Ewwww. Why is it that you can tell he's a molester, just by looking at him? What is it about a guy's face that suggests it?
16 posted on 01/22/2004 8:32:39 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Redcoat LI
Repeatedly drugged and raped a young boy.

Repeatedly drugged and raped a young girl.

Failed to register as a sex offender.

Forged a Percocet prescription. Is this the same drug he used previously to drug his little rape victims?

Failed to notify probation of the arrest.

Failed to pay a probation service fee.

Classified as a Level 3 sex offender - considered the most likely to reoffend.

Skipped out on sex offender treatment.

Despite his rap sheet, which dates back to 1981, and the alleged probation violations, Woburn District Court Judge George Sprague released him on $300 bail, an amount agreed upon by prosecutors and Bizanowicz's lawyer. This means he had to pay a bail bondsman $30, right?

Under state law, a new arrest (arrest, not conviction) is a probation violation. It is the probation officer's decision whether to file charges. A hearing on the alleged probation violations was slated for Feb. 3 in Lowell Superior Court - nearly eight months after his June 17, 2003, arrest in Woburn for forging a prescription. It was unknown yesterday when that hearing date was scheduled. The article doesn't state when all the other probation violations occurred, or when or if the probation department ever intended to do anything about them. ``Our probation department did work. They were bringing him in,'' she (Justice Suzanne Delvecchio, head of the state's superior courts) said. ``Unfortunately, (the Woburn murders) occurred before the hearing.'' An unfortunate choice of words, if you ask me.

17 posted on 01/22/2004 8:38:24 AM PST by BykrBayb (Temporary tagline. Applied to State of New Jersey for permanent tagline (12/24/03).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Exactly right.
They changed the laws to revoke everybody's Firearms Identification cards,which were originally issued for life,and mysteriously failed to notify a majority of license holders.
Didn't work,I'm still heavily armed.
18 posted on 01/22/2004 9:03:01 AM PST by Redcoat LI ("If you're going to shoot,shoot,don't talk" Tuco BenedictoPacifico Juan Maria Ramirez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Redcoat LI
Just from observation: if probation officials are reluctant to file "violations" ,it's usually because the sentencing judge-who hears these violations in most jurisdictions-does little more than scold the PO for having filed.

To add insult to injury,the most common "penalty" for VOP is (ready for this ? )additional probation.

The real question is: How do some of these offenders get probation to start with ?

Ask the judges,and they'll blame the pre-sentence report-written,of course,by probation...without mentioning the fact judges are "jaw boning" prosecutors,defense attys,and probation officers into agreeing to probation terms,and rejecting out-of-hand pre-sentence reports that recommend incarceration.

The justice system is more concerned with the system than with justice - and has been for some time.

19 posted on 01/22/2004 9:26:17 AM PST by genefromjersey (So little time - so many FLAMES to light !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson