Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nanodik
LOL!

It's wrong, and the fact that the poster I was responding to, or you for that matter, are repeating erroneous information that neither he, nor you have bothered double-checking, makes the both of you the "bots".

The fact of the matter, is that that statement was so completely wrong, and that the people repeating that lie, over, and over, and over again are simply allowing themselves/yourselves to be led by the nose is pathetic

Government spending, measured as a percentage of the GDP was significantly higher from 1982 through 1992.

Government expenditures per person has remained fairly steady over the past twenty years, and the national debt per person spiked from 1982 through 1997, when it dropped significantly, then began to rise again in 2001 as it always does during times of war. All these figures are calculated in inflation adjusted 2002 dollars.

All this information is readily available on the Internet for those of us who refuse to be led by the lies of others.

Some, are just to lazy to find the truth, so they instead opt to believe whatever others tell them.

If you're looking for mindless "bots" that would be them...maybe you.
1,512 posted on 01/22/2004 7:38:56 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1500 | View Replies ]


To: Luis Gonzalez
So you mean it really does not matter whether we have a Dem or a Rep as prez! I am SHOCKED! SHOCKED I TELL YOU! Ok, I guess I am wrong, Dubya is on par with Bill Clinton.
1,524 posted on 01/22/2004 7:55:37 PM PST by Nanodik (Libertarian, Ex-Canadian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1512 | View Replies ]

To: Luis Gonzalez; Nanodik
From Clinton, we learned that the word is can have a multitude of meanings.

From Bush and his supporters, we've learned that a $1 TRILLION dollar increase in the federal debt isn't really a $1 TRILLION dollar freakin' unbelievable, outrageous increase.

Oh no, it's a smaller percentage of the GDP than was spent from 1982 to 1992.

Clinton never would have dreamed that anyone that called themselves Republicans would be gullible enough to fall for that one. LOL!

Bush has also shown that many voters that call themselves Republicans will believe that a proposal to pardon all of the illegal aliens in our country and allow them to stay isn't really an amnesty.

That one probably still has Clinton speechless.

The only regret Clinton probably has, about all of the fooling around he did in the 'Oval Orifice', is it could have been him that thought this crap up, if he'd of spent that extra time thinking about how to fool the Republican voters.

ROTFLMAO!

1,680 posted on 01/23/2004 6:13:19 AM PST by 4Freedom (America is no longer the 'Land of Opportunity', it's the 'Land of Illegal Alien Opportunists'!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1512 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson