Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Atlantic Friend
Would you say Dresden, Hiroshima and Nagasaki were war crimes ?

Here's a little insight from Truman on the method of choosing the targets of Hiroshima and Nagasaki:

This weapon is to be used against Japan between now and August 10th. I have told the Sec. of War, Mr. Stimson, to use it so that military objectives and soldiers and sailors are the target and not women and children. Even if the Japs are savages, ruthless, merciless and fanatic, we as the leader of the world for the common welfare cannot drop that terrible bomb on the old capital or the new
We bombed legitimate targets in an effort to stop the war and avert a much worse (especially for the Japanese) invasion.

Dresden was a city of little industrial importance and cramped full of refugees fleeing the Russians at a time when Germany's industrial might had been crushed and forces were advancing on both sides. The war would be over in two more months.

The British firebombed an entire city of civilians and wounded soldiers for dubious military reasons, destroying 14,000 homes, 72 schools, 22 hospitals and other buildings, and apparently no military targets. To give an idea of the calculated devastation, the British first dropped HE bombs to expose the timbers of all of the buildings, then dropped incindiary bombs to light them, then more HE and strafing to hamper firefighting efforts. When the air above the city heated enough, cold air rushed in at ground level to replace the quickly rising hot air, sucking people into the firestorm. This as opposed to a simple HE bombing to take out military targets. The attack was designed to completely devastate a civilian population, and had a body count higher than that of Hiroshima.

21 posted on 01/21/2004 10:15:09 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat
Jeez, I had no idea it was THAT awful. But isn't an enemy city a legitimate target in times of war ?
22 posted on 01/21/2004 10:21:36 AM PST by Atlantic Friend (Cursum Perficio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: antiRepublicrat
One theory of why the Brits firebombed Dresden is that the Russians were about to capture it. Churchill wanted Stalin's troops to see what British bombers had done. He feared the Soviet leader would use see only how much larger the Red Army was than the Anglo-American Army and start a war. He wanted to make sure Stalin included the power of strategic bombing in his calculations.
24 posted on 01/21/2004 10:52:04 AM PST by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson