Skip to comments.
The Man from Hate. What Dean really stands for. (Chucky Alert! Choppy, Choppy)
NRO ^
| January 20, 2004, 9:15 a.m.
| By Timothy P. Carney
Posted on 01/20/2004 10:35:46 AM PST by .cnI redruM
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
To: samtheman
I am "deeply saddened" today. I really hoped Dean could pin down the nomination before the Dims figured out who he is. I guess the silver lining is that to the Dims the picture of an "electable" candidate is a Massachusetts liberal.
21
posted on
01/20/2004 12:16:33 PM PST
by
colorado tanker
("There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots")
To: .cnI redruM
i have very mixed feelings about that!
Would prefer to have him against Bush. I think he's easiest to beat.
22
posted on
01/20/2004 1:18:57 PM PST
by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: .cnI redruM
Dean has $20 million and enough hatred to cover many states.
And the press is bored with chewing him up and will barbecue one of these other oafs next. I think it'll be Kerry or maybe Clark. They'll leave Edwards alone for now.
To: Luke21
> We are winning, aside from our conservative friends here, who hate Bush, and have forgotten the lessons of Perot. <
Hate Bush? No. I just don't see him as much different, in terms of policy, from the previous admin. Better than any Dem, sure, but only marginally so.
Pubs and Dems have their disagreements on the margins, but when you get down to it, there's not much difference between the two parties.
Comment #25 Removed by Moderator
To: .cnI redruM
Awww, man! I wanted to see Nikita Dean get the Dem nomination, the only reason being that I want to see the Nationally Socialistic Democrats get their a$$es KICKED this coming November.
The man is insane, but it would make for a campaign that late night talk show hosts would be joking about for YEARS!
26
posted on
01/20/2004 2:52:22 PM PST
by
FierceDraka
(Service and Glory!)
To: FierceDraka
bump
27
posted on
01/20/2004 3:52:40 PM PST
by
rocksblues
(Keep em Flying and come home safe!)
To: Seamonster
This is who/what Howard Dean reminds me of!
<img src="http://www.rocksblues.com/images/hitler.jpeg><p> They say that history repeats itself. Who would of believed we would of been the one's to be a part of it?<p> "http://www.livingstonemusic.net/hitlerandtheoccult.htm"
28
posted on
01/20/2004 4:05:54 PM PST
by
rocksblues
(Keep em Flying and come home safe!)
To: .cnI redruM
Well, he went down to dinner in his Sunday best
Excitable boy, they all said
And he rubbed the pot roast all over his chest
Excitable boy, they all said
Well, he's just an excitable boy
-Warren Zevon
29
posted on
01/20/2004 4:08:43 PM PST
by
socal_parrot
(http://www.campbellforsenate.com)
To: mhking
Nah. Dean makes Macho Man sound rational!
To: colorado tanker
Don't be deeply saddened. It was too much to hope for. Kind of like pinning our hopes on the nomination of Kucinich or Sharpton. Ain't gonna happen. And neither was Dean. It was only a matter of (short) time before he strapped on a suicide built and pushed the button.
Anyway, he's got all that money. He can still do a lot of damage along the way. Might even go third party. He's selfish enough. He's ignorant enough. His hard-core followers are stupid enough.
And as for the others. Kerry. Clark. Edwards. Don't worry. Bush will beat any of them.
To: Seamonster
To say that his wife is an unnecessary prop demeans the Office of the Presidency of Our Great Country. Doesn't it also demean his wife and his marriage? After all a man doesn't become President without bringing his family front and center into the public square of national politics whether they are willing or not. Does she have nothing to offer other than being a stage prop? Is their marriage just a legal formality? Does he plan to go to DC and be President of the United States while she stays in VT treating dairy farmer's sinus infections?
32
posted on
01/20/2004 8:18:39 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(Regime change in the courts. Impeach liberal judges!)
To: samtheman
Might even go third party.Be still my beating heart.
To: samtheman
And as for the others. Kerry. Clark. Edwards. Don't worry. Bush will beat any of them.I agree. Dean was going to be fun because I could see Bush racking up maybe 49 states against him. Kerry or Edwards would hold more of the Dim base together to take some blue states. Given Clark's weirdness factor and tendency to deny his past, Bush could win that one in a landslide too.
34
posted on
01/21/2004 9:09:55 AM PST
by
colorado tanker
("There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots")
To: colorado tanker
And it's always possible that no matter who the RATS run we can take 49 states. Depends on how we work together.
To: samtheman
Depends on how we work together.True. And from what I've seen on FR lately, I'm not optimistic about that.
36
posted on
01/21/2004 3:09:06 PM PST
by
colorado tanker
("There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-36 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson