To: GulliverSwift
To all;
Any idea what this means to the Clintons? Things seem to be working according to their plans, but did they expect their hand picked candidate Clark to make such a poor showing?
2,369 posted on
01/19/2004 8:16:10 PM PST by
Hillarys Gate Cult
(Proud member of the right wing extremist Neanderthals.)
To: Hillarys Gate Cult
I am sure they did since Clark wasn't running in Iowa.
2,378 posted on
01/19/2004 8:17:17 PM PST by
nhoward14
(Everyone stop posting urban legends... especially the Target one!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: Hillarys Gate Cult
but did they expect their hand picked candidate Clark to make such a poor showing?
Dont be so sure Clark is the spawn..Edwards is a lawyer in brotherhood
To: Hillarys Gate Cult
Clark didn't run in Iowa; we have to wait for New Hampshire to see how Clark does.
2,384 posted on
01/19/2004 8:17:55 PM PST by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Hillarys Gate Cult
did they expect their hand picked candidate Clark to make such a poor showing?
What do you think his showing was?
To: Hillarys Gate Cult
Kerry's allegiance is to Kennedy, not Clinton. Lehaine (sp) will make quick work of Kerry. Clark is the only one of the candidates who guarantees the Clintons retain power. I don't think the Clintons have a grand plan for this. They just know what they want, but don't know how they are going to get there. The problem is that BC is a poll driven animal. He will move checkers pieces based on the latest tracking poll.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson