Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: goodnesswins
Yeah, guess that would be a sitting Senator winning the White House, so that takes care of the more extreme of my examples.

But how about a sitting Senator sans executive branch experience winning?

And while you are right with Kennedy, that was one wicked close election, which Kennedy may not really have won, if not for some help from the Daleys...

1,825 posted on 01/19/2004 7:13:30 PM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1790 | View Replies ]


To: William McKinley
Kennedy didn't need Illinois to win actually.
1,839 posted on 01/19/2004 7:15:32 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1825 | View Replies ]

To: William McKinley
YES....Nixon didn't pull a Gore on him....Nixon could have made things really messy that year, from what I've heard.
1,840 posted on 01/19/2004 7:15:44 PM PST by goodnesswins (Poverty is more about the "mental" than the "money.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1825 | View Replies ]

To: Mo1
Yep, I forgot that one. See 1825.
1,843 posted on 01/19/2004 7:16:23 PM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1825 | View Replies ]

To: William McKinley; goodnesswins
You can't count JFK, if your question was if a President has ever lost to a sitting Senator. Eisenhower wasn't running in 1960.
1,850 posted on 01/19/2004 7:17:10 PM PST by wimpycat ("Black holes are where God divided by zero.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1825 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson