In some ways, the Bush administration is worse, such as out-doing Clinton in spending. He could have stopped this with the veto pen or instructing his cabinet not to spend money on legislation that for unconstitutional activities. So far, Bush has done neither.
Furthermore, Bush has declined to veto funding for pro-abortion organizations. Rather, he signed such legislation. As a pro-lifer, I am opposed to any federal funding of abortion. Human life is sacred at all stages beginning with conception, and it should be defended, not exterminated at taxpayer expense. (For details see Why Christians should not vote for George W. Bush, Bush Betrays Pro-Life Cause Again, Backs Federal Aid to Overseas Abortion Providers, and Redirection of $34 million from UNFPA to USAID a 'stab in the back' ).
There is another word for extravagent, excessive, perhaps even wasteful spending. It is called "liberal."
We are blessed with a candidate who stands for the right to life and restoring the freedoms of the states and the people as outlined in the Bill of Rights. His name is Michael Peroutka, a candidate for the Constitution Party presidential nomination. He needs the support of concerned citizens who want to restore the integrity of our republic.