Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bush2000

"...statistics gathered by leading security company SecurityFocus on their NTBugTraq site say differently..."

Note that part of their site name is "NT". How impartial do you think that makes them. In fact, I follow their postings regularly, along with those of several other security sites. The one thing that I have noticed about NTBugTraq is that when there are several interrelated bugs in Microsloth Windows based OS's, they almost always bundle them together as only one event, but in similar situations, on non-Microsloth products, they always create separate incidents. That's the kind of diddling with the numbers that it takes to make Microsloth even appear to be somewhat secure. But, the picture is quite different, when viewed from the trenches.

I have run entire IT departments for very large corporations and have been a US security lead for a major oil company and in all those years, two things have become obvious. First, it not only takes significantly more security support staff to secure and keep secure Microsloth based systems, than any UNIX based systems, including LINUX, but the Microsloth security staff has to be much better trained than their UNIX counterparts. Secondly, even with that larger and better trained support staff, the few successful attacks that we experienced were almost exclusively on Microsloth based systems. At one company, we had one MCSE and two MCSE/MCSA's, who were all security specialists and who did nothing else. Those three highly trained specialists maintained security on one fifth as many servers as our single UNIX security man did and he had only a high school diploma and some practical experience and handled system admin work on several of those UNIX systems, as well. While I was there, we never had a single successful attack on a UNIX (or LINUX) based system, while successful NT attacks, though not common, were far from rare. And that's not even considering the Windows desktop attacks and the additional security staff that we had to deal with those problems.

I am now the Infrastructure Director of a new international natural resources exploration and development company. Some time back, we decided that all of our servers will be UNIX (or LINUX) based and our desktops and laptops will all be Macs (UNIX under the hood). Since we began operating in this environment, we have not had a single security event of any kind. I wonder how many companies can say the same of their Microsloth based networks.

 

19 posted on 01/10/2004 2:11:12 PM PST by Action-America (Best President: Reagan * Worst President: Klinton * Worst GOP President: Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Action-America
. . . and our desktops and laptops will all be Macs (UNIX under the hood) . . .

Better watch out, Action. Bush hates Macintoshes even more than Linux!

22 posted on 01/10/2004 4:02:13 PM PST by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Action-America
Note that part of their site name is "NT". How impartial do you think that makes them.

I dunno. What isn't objective about supplying bug reports?!? As for incident reports, give an example. I'd like to see exactly what you're complaining about.
24 posted on 01/10/2004 4:22:47 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson