Skip to comments.
President Bush Proposes New Temporary Worker Program [Transcript]
The White House ^
| Jan 7, 2004
| President George W. Bush
Posted on 01/07/2004 1:59:53 PM PST by NonValueAdded
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 341-346 next last
To: McGavin999
No, in past Amnesty programs you applied for it, got it, and got to stay forever. Here you do not. If you apply for a guest worker program from your home country and you optain a job you get issued the permit at no charge. If you are here and apply for the program you must have a job and you must pay a fee. AND at the end of the 3 year period you must return to your home country. BIG DIFFERENCE If you prefer to ignore the meaning of amnesty (a governmental pardon to a group of people) in order to spin for this Administration, be my guest. I'm not surprised, given the fact that I've never seen you criticize any action of this administration.
61
posted on
01/07/2004 2:42:08 PM PST
by
NittanyLion
(E-A-G-L-E-S...Eagles!)
To: All
AMNESTY, n. The state's magnanimity to those offenders whom it would be too expensive to punish. - The Devil's Dictionary
AMNESTY, n. a warrant granting release from punishment for an offense
citizenship must not be the automatic reward for violating the laws of America
So who said awarding law breakers a prize like citizenship is the only meaning of amnesty? Granting a de facto warrant is amnesty. Entering the country ILLEGALLY is just one broken law. What about bogus documents, etc.
If the President had said that English is the language from now on, that when in America do as the Americans then I'd be happy. So, it's up to the Republicans. Protect our borders, language, and culture or see lots of us vote for None of the Above for president next November. I am serious about "when in America do as the Americans" - I would have accepted full citizenship in exchange for doing away with all that sickening multi-cultural crap.
To: NonValueAdded
mark for later
63
posted on
01/07/2004 2:43:28 PM PST
by
UB355
To: McGavin999
If you lose your job, you must go home. Why? Because they'd be breaking the law? These are the same people currently breaking the law, but I suppose they'll do as President Bush says out of the goodness of their heart.
The employers will be responsible for reporting if you have been dismissed.
Are these the same employers currently employing illegals? Last I checked that's illegal, but I suppose they'll instantly be reformed. You know, because President Bush says so.
Amazing...
64
posted on
01/07/2004 2:45:41 PM PST
by
NittanyLion
(E-A-G-L-E-S...Eagles!)
To: NittanyLion; george wythe
I was asking you a question. Based on your comments I couldn't tell whether you supported this plan, or merely thought it isn't as bad as represented on FR. I apologize. I misunderstood your intent. My complaint was about all of the knee-jerking going on all over FR about this topic.
To answer your question, I'll refer you to george wythe's #26 in this thread, since he said it so much better than I could.
65
posted on
01/07/2004 2:46:17 PM PST
by
alnick
To: King Black Robe
This will be pretty easy to enforce. If you are standing in a parking lot awaiting a day labor job, the first truck that pulls up will probably have INS on the side. You won't have a thing to say about it if you don't have your citizenship. If you have a blue card, it means you are in violation and will be shipped home. If you have neither a blue card or citizenship, you will be shipped home.
What this law will do is make the rules clear and anyone violating it will be punished. There will be no "Everyone has been doing this for decades and never punished". There are new rules, everyone will understand them, and those who break them will be punished. The illegals by being shipped home with no hope of ever obtaining either a card or citizenship ever, and employers will pay hefty fines and probably prison sentences. Considering the security problem today, they will be luckey if that's all they get.
66
posted on
01/07/2004 2:47:00 PM PST
by
McGavin999
(Don't be a Freeploader-Have you donated yet?)
To: NonValueAdded
Bush is a courageous leader who is willing to take risks to do what is right. I thought people here already knew that.
To: NonValueAdded
68
posted on
01/07/2004 2:48:41 PM PST
by
hattend
(Mr Bush, the Supremes upheld CFR...what's your plan B? Too late to veto, now)
To: alnick
Thanks. As I look back at my response I can see how you thought it was a mischaracterization. I should've asked your personal feelings on the subject, as opposed to assuming that you supported it.
69
posted on
01/07/2004 2:49:09 PM PST
by
NittanyLion
(E-A-G-L-E-S...Eagles!)
To: King Black Robe
We never knew who they were before. Now we will. Those who apply will have written record and their employer will be responsible for reporting if they become unemployed. Those who do not have blue cards within a certain timeframe will be deported automatically. All the lobbying and all the lawyers in the world will not be able to stop it.
That, my friend, is the difference. Our current laws have been ignored so long that lawyers and activist groups get these people off. With new rules in place, they can't say "this is the way it's always done".
70
posted on
01/07/2004 2:50:07 PM PST
by
McGavin999
(Don't be a Freeploader-Have you donated yet?)
To: McGavin999
I will believe it when I see it on the enforcement part. Regardless, this is amnesty by another name. Next time around will be the last last chance. Then the last last LAST chance.
71
posted on
01/07/2004 2:50:07 PM PST
by
King Black Robe
(With freedom of religion and speech now abridged, it is time to go after the press.)
To: All
Folks, the problem isn't people coming here and working. It's people coming here who seek out every bennie the welfare state has to offer them, their wives, their children and any odd relative as well.
Increasing bureaucracy while further expanding the welfare state doesn't sound "conservative" or "centrist" to me.
72
posted on
01/07/2004 2:51:19 PM PST
by
jimt
To: NittanyLion
"It depends on what the meaning of the word 'lettinglawbreakersoffthehookforvotes'is."
73
posted on
01/07/2004 2:52:05 PM PST
by
KantianBurke
(Don't Tread on Me)
To: McGavin999
Those who apply will have written record and their employer will be responsible for reporting if they become unemployed. These are the same employers who have to this point employed illegals (an illegal practice in itself), right? Just checking.
74
posted on
01/07/2004 2:52:36 PM PST
by
NittanyLion
(E-A-G-L-E-S...Eagles!)
To: King Black Robe
No, it's not amnisty at all. The difference is in the time frame. This is a temporary workers permit. It does not grant the right to apply for citizenship.
75
posted on
01/07/2004 2:52:45 PM PST
by
McGavin999
(Don't be a Freeploader-Have you donated yet?)
To: *immigrant_list; A Navy Vet; Lion Den Dan; Free the USA; Libertarianize the GOP; madfly; B4Ranch; ..
ping
To: McGavin999
"If you lose your job, you must go home"
And if the illegal squirts out a couple anchor babies or smiles and says 'come get me' what are you going to do?? Deport'em huh. Really. You go ahead and think that.
77
posted on
01/07/2004 2:54:32 PM PST
by
KantianBurke
(Don't Tread on Me)
To: McGavin999
No, it's not amnisty at all. The difference is in the time frame. This is a temporary workers permit. It does not grant the right to apply for citizenship. Go to Merriam-Webster Online and look up the definition of amnesty. You'll see that it has nothing to do with citizenship; rather it speaks about governmental pardon of a group of people.
How long are you going to continue promoting this falsehood?
78
posted on
01/07/2004 2:54:39 PM PST
by
NittanyLion
(E-A-G-L-E-S...Eagles!)
To: NittanyLion
Probably so. But this time they will be on record. When you apply for your blue card you must be employed. Your employer will be listed. The employer will be notified of his responsibilities. It's easy enough to check out because if they are not reported on their unemployment reports each quarter that's it. INS turns up, asks where the employee is, when the boss says he's not there he will be asked why he failed to report him on his quarterlies. The cuffs will come out because one way or the other the employer has broken the law. Easy.
79
posted on
01/07/2004 2:55:53 PM PST
by
McGavin999
(Don't be a Freeploader-Have you donated yet?)
To: McGavin999
And the American taxpayer continues to get stuck with the services tab.
The only reason Americans won't take the jobs is because they pay slave wages, with the benefits being picked up by American taxpayers. Why can't companies just pay market value (American market value) for the labor? Why can't they at least pay the entire gov't services tab for these people, minus standard taxation (which at those wages will be zip). Why must we the taxpayer subsidize this project? WE go to jail if we don't pay our taxes. Why should we have to obey laws when others don't?
80
posted on
01/07/2004 2:56:29 PM PST
by
King Black Robe
(With freedom of religion and speech now abridged, it is time to go after the press.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 341-346 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson