[technochick99]

You're not the one that I was directing my annoyance at, but thank you anyway. It's remarkable, I could have come on FR and slammed my ex-husband so easily just by telling the truth of what happened. However, I thought that it would be terrible of me to do so. And I still stand by that. I haven't posted much of anything of the divorce, the events leading up to it, nor anything to do with his character or personality. But, he feels it's ok to do that to me. I don't want to be put in the position of replying, but I am tired of the way I am being portrayed. Maybe that's something he should place in his journal: "act more like the way John Wayne would".

What happened between us is private and personal. Yet I still see things splashed all about. Tell me hopespringseternal, what's a FReeper chick to do?!?

[Nita Nupress]

I can't think of many things worse than trying to FReep in the same cyber-space occupied by an ex-spouse. Good gosh, what a nightmare.

Just a neutral observation. You won't find me choosing sides in THIS one, no-sir-eee. Good luck to both of you, and remember The Golden Rule. :-)

[Quix]

Ask Jim/John R for a new screen name?

Create a new personna and leave the past more behind, might work.

[Publius6961]

Yet I still see things splashed all about. Tell me hopespringseternal, what's a FReeper chick to do?!?

You should stop stop talking about it. Seriously. I was clueless as to the connection. All of the useful inferences were the result of your posts.
I may be dense in retrospect, but I prefer to think that a mild case of paranoia worked against you.