Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Al-Qaida planned US blitz (Al Qaeda)
Austraila Herald Sun ^ | Jan. 4, 2004 | Ben English

Posted on 01/05/2004 11:52:59 PM PST by FairOpinion

THE panic gripping passenger flights on both sides of the Atlantic was sparked by the discovery of an al-Qaida plot to simultaneously hijack several aircraft and crash them into key US sites.

Top of the list was the White House, but the terrorists also aimed to hit nuclear power stations on the US east coast, unspecified targets in Los Angeles and the giant Valdez oil terminal in Alaska. American and British intelligence operatives learned of the plot from a tip-off on the weekend before Christmas.

The informant said Islamic fanatics planned to hijack flights operated by British Airways, Air France and AeroMexico.

The warning explains the 10 groundings of airliners in Europe and America during the festive break, including two in a row of BA223 -- the afternoon flight between London and Washington.

British security agents were last night conducting an intense manhunt for two al-Qaida operatives they believe intended to board flight 223 wearing shoe-bombs.

They also believe the would-be hijackers may be carrying legitimate US, British, or other Euro passports in a bid to evade stringent security checks.

Another theory is that an extremist may have infiltrated the ranks of airline pilots.

US investigators will screen all pilots flying into America in a bid to uncover any such deadly mole.

British foreign intelligence agency MI6 is sifting through more than 150 terrorist threats a day as world authorities grapple with the biggest perceived threat to security since September 11.

More flights from British airports are expected to be cancelled this week.

Revelations of Osama bin Laden's latest audacious plot came after a court in Milan heard of London's key role in his terror network.

Leaked police transcripts were released to the court showing that as recently as June 2002, al-Qaida considered the British capital to be the organisation's European nerve centre.

Members could be smuggled in and out of Britain on false passports with apparent ease.

But by March last year, London was considered dangerous, perhaps reflecting a major crackdown that led to 500 arrests of terror suspects since September 11.

The documents formed part of a dossier against seven al-Qaida suspects on trial in the Italian city.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airlinesecurity; orangealert4
Terror alert is definitely not over...
1 posted on 01/05/2004 11:53:00 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Rank Location Receipts Donors/Avg Freepers/Avg Monthlies
25 Missouri 221.00
6
36.83
331
0.67
198.00
14

Thanks for donating to Free Republic!

Move your locale up the leaderboard!

2 posted on 01/05/2004 11:53:54 PM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I have a hard time believing any of those flights could have enough gas to go from their origin to the Valdez facilities.

Maybe the plan was to take the Aeromexico plane after it got to LA to Alaska but that's a long flight to make over many A.F. bases (something like 7-8 hours I would guess but at least as long as flying from Seattle to the East Coast) without getting shot out of the sky.
3 posted on 01/05/2004 11:59:22 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig ("That is the widsom of the past, for all wisdom is not new wisdom")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
definitely not .. Bump
4 posted on 01/06/2004 12:03:17 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi Mac ....... Become a Monthly at FR... https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
panic gripping passenger flights on both sides of the Atlantic

what panic???

5 posted on 01/06/2004 12:06:45 AM PST by GeronL (Ah daunt yous spiel cheekier ether)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: big ern
Weren't some LAX - Europe flights cancelled/delayed also? Those would have a ton of fuel on board.
6 posted on 01/06/2004 12:09:42 AM PST by LPStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All
Well, I can tell you one thing that is certain... 3 Mile Island must have been of some concern lately. The amount of air patrols going over my house since about a week before Christmas is pretty impressive. Add to that the number of single engine prop planes flying around, and it seems like they were worried about it. I live about 15 minutes from TMI, and at one time worked there in the IT department. I am really hoping security has gotten a hell of alot better since than. When I worked there, you just needed your security badge, and I had my car searched in a random check once in 2 years....
7 posted on 01/06/2004 12:21:08 AM PST by jempet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: big ern
Maybe the plan was to take the Aeromexico plane after it got to LA to Alaska but that's a long flight to make over many A.F. bases (something like 7-8 hours I would guess but at least as long as flying from Seattle to the East Coast) without getting shot out of the sky.

If we're compelled to shoot down an airliner, that's going to be more than a marginal victory for the terrorists.

8 posted on 01/06/2004 12:27:36 AM PST by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: big ern
Alaska is 9 hours from everywhere. It is why Anchorage is becoming such a huge cargo hub -- it is a handy central point for a lot of international shipping.
9 posted on 01/06/2004 12:31:44 AM PST by kingu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
What strikes me as curious is how little attention is being put on to the international cargo agencies. I wasn't paying attention the other day when I went to make a delivery to the FedEx terminal at the airport and I drove up to the base of the plane...

I thought I was going to be shot on sight. Instead, a helpful ground crew member told me how to take a shortcut to the shipping counter.
10 posted on 01/06/2004 12:33:55 AM PST by kingu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
British security agents were last night conducting an intense manhunt for two al-Qaida operatives they believe intended to board flight 223 wearing shoe-bombs.

So, if the plan was to crash the plane into a specific target, why the shoe bombs? To hold the passengers at bay? Don't think that's going to work this time. I think even the Frogs would try to fight them.

At least now we know what took 3 hours to deplane at Dulles. The Brits must have thought we Americans had a shoe fetish.

11 posted on 01/06/2004 12:37:10 AM PST by Tall_Texan (Happy 2004 - the year we put Republicanism into overdrive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
I have two more domestic flights scheduled in the last two weeks of January. One week in Birmingham, AL and the other in Chicago, IL. The Birmingham trip puts me at a huge coal-fired electric plant. Both locations are more interesting targets than my little town in Idaho. Both trips will be even more intrusive at the TSA counter. I'm more concerned about my "on the ground" time than the actual flights.
12 posted on 01/06/2004 12:37:45 AM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Bump!
13 posted on 01/06/2004 12:46:32 AM PST by Pro-Bush (Homeland Security + Tom Ridge = Open Borders --> Demand Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu; dennisw
I wasn't paying attention the other day when I went to make a delivery to the FedEx terminal at the airport and I drove up to the base of the plane... I thought I was going to be shot on sight. Instead, a helpful ground crew member told me how to take a shortcut to the shipping counter.

Unless you look Arab or have a Muslim "shoe bomber" type aura, look at the bright side: the average ramp worker simply discerned immediately that you were of no threat. You passed his/her intuitive profile test, recognizing that you were a real American who didn't need to be shot on sight. :-)

Now if the ground crew looked suspicious (maybe I'd better not go there), then we have worse problems than a lack of gates/guards. What good will it do if you are prevented from accidentally accessing a plane, while those who continually work on or near aircraft, are Al Qaeda sympathizers. How can they screen people out, who merely have an interesting circle of personal jihad-loving friends (no paper trails or prior jobs at the local NOI chapter)?

Where was it (Logan?) that they reviewed employee files and discovered a bunch of illegals and/or criminals? What red flags weren't on paper, that they missed? Yeesh.

14 posted on 01/06/2004 1:09:11 AM PST by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kingu
re post no. 10...Links Of Interest:


WREG.com - News Channel 3, Memphis TN: "LETTER THREATENS FedEx PLANES" (December 30, 2003) (Read More...)

SUN-SENTINEL.com - South Florida's Latest News: "FBI INVESTIGATES LETTER WARNING OF DANGER TO FedEx AIRPLANES" (December 30, 2003) (Read More...)

15 posted on 01/06/2004 1:20:18 AM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson