[MJY1288]

"You've made these requests in the past, and I've answered."

That's a bald face lie and you know it. The fact is that your whole argument is based purely on speculation and you are a professional at it. What gets old is your inability to post a single quote by this President that remotely resembles your claims, and you can't produce a single proposal that backs up your baseless claims.

I asked you a question in post #162 and you ignored it, and you and I know why, you just can't admit it

[Sabertooth]

That's a bald face lie and you know it. The fact is that your whole argument is based purely on speculation and you are a professional at it. What gets old is your inability to post a single quote by this President that remotely resembles your claims, and you can't produce a single proposal that backs up your baseless claims.

It's the truth, but I'm not inclined to run through our posts for the past year and a half to demonstrate it to you.

Baseless? We'll see.

I asked you a question in post #162 and you ignored it, and you and I know why, you just can't admit it

This question?

"Can you post a single road trip where Bush "pushed" for 245(i) ?"

It's a silly question. You established a false premise at #162 that we know of the President's doings by his road trips, and consequently, that the absence of a road trip equalled evidence of the absence of some activity. This is formally known as an argument from ignorance fallacy.