Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Air-Maneuver and Transport Concept: Can it Transform the Nature of Rapid Contingency Operations?
Army Magazine, AUSA ^ | Jan 04 | Lt. Gen. H. Thomas Fields Jr., U.S. Army retired

Posted on 01/05/2004 5:34:40 PM PST by xzins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: xzins
First trick to defeating a SAM with a five-mile range: stay six miles from the launcher.

"Hit him where he ain't."
41 posted on 01/06/2004 11:11:14 AM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah; Paul Ross
Excellent point....

Paul, see PB's #41.
42 posted on 01/06/2004 11:15:35 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: xzins; Cannoneer No. 4
An alternate would be using the Boeing Pelican (See below) with existing shorter range helo and ground forces to deploy from secured airfields. This would only require the development of the ground-effect Pelican transport aircraft which should be an order of mangnitude easier than creating a fleet of long range, high payload capacity helos of equivalent airlift.

Source

The Pelican: A big bird for the long haul

BY WILLIAM COLE

It would be the biggest bird in the history of aviation.

Dwarfing all previous flying giants, the Pelican, a high-capacity cargo plane concept currently being studied by Boeing Phantom Works, would stretch more than the length of a U.S. football field and have a wingspan of 500 feet and a wing area of more than an acre. It would have almost twice the external dimensions of the world's current largest aircraft, the Russian An225, and could transport five times its payload, up to 1,400 tons of cargo.

Designed primarily for long-range, transoceanic transport, the Pelican would fly as low as 20 feet above the sea, taking advantage of an aerodynamic phenomenon that reduces drag and fuel burn. Over land, it would fly at altitudes of 20,000 feet or higher. Operating only from ordinary paved runways, the Pelican would use 38 fuselage-mounted landing gears with a total of 76 tires to distribute its weight.

The military, commercial and even space prospects for such a cargo plane—officially known as the Pelican Ultra Large Transport Aircraft, or ULTRA—are also huge.

"The Pelican can broaden the range of missions for which airplanes are the favored way to deliver cargo," said Boeing's Pelican program manager Blaine Rawdon, who is designing the plane with Boeing engineer Zachary Hoisington. "It is much faster than ships at a fraction of the operational cost of current airplanes. This will be attractive to commercial and military operators who desire speed, worldwide range and high throughput. We envision that the Pelican can multiply aircraft's 1-percent share in a commercial market now dominated by container ships."

John Skorupa, senior manager of strategic development for Boeing Advanced Airlift and Tankers, said, "The Pelican currently stands as the only identified means by which the U.S. Army can achieve its deployment transformation goals of deploying one division in five days, or five divisions in 30 days, anywhere in the world." If necessary, he said, the Pelican could carry 17 M-1 main battle tanks on a single sortie. Commercially, the aircraft's size and efficiency would allow it to carry types of cargo equivalent to those carried by container ships, at more than 10 times the speed.

"It is attracting interest as a mother ship for unmanned vehicles, enabling rapid deployment of a network-centric warfare grid, a likely future mode of operation for modernized U.S. forces as demonstrated in Afghanistan," Skorupa said. "And it is attracting interest as a potential first-stage platform for piggybacking reusable space vehicles to an appropriate launch altitude.

"Why would such a huge airplane be flown at such a low altitude?

By flying low, the Pelican, like its name-sake, exploits the aerodynamic benefits of a well-known phenomenon called ground effect. Flying close to water, the wing downwash angle and tip vortices are suppressed, resulting in a major drag reduction and outstanding cruise efficiency.

"It's an effect that provides extraordinary range and efficiency," Skorupa said. "With a payload of 1.5 million pounds, the Pelican could fly 10,000 nautical miles over water and 6,500 nautical miles over land.

"Flying in ground effect demands the latest flight control technology, conceded Skorupa. Reliable systems will provide precise, automatic altitude control and collision avoidance. Cruise altitude will be adjusted according to sea state, and if the seas get too rough, the Pelican can easily climb to high altitude to continue the flight.

When could the Pelican be flying? The answer may lie in the Army's Advanced Mobility Concepts Study, scheduled for release next April. The Pelican has been offered by Boeing as part of a system-of-systems solution that would include the C-17 Globemaster III transport, the CH-47 Chinook helicopter and the Advanced Theater Transport.

"A favorable report would set the stage for a possible codevelopment effort between Boeing, the U.S. military and interested commercial cargo carriers," Skorupa said.

43 posted on 01/07/2004 4:28:19 PM PST by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jriemer
Big, big, bird.

It's an amazing machine. I'm pretty sure it couldn't be initial strike airlift, but it might be follow-on airlift.

Given its size that should limit where it can land. That way if the enemy had even a plausible suspicion that you might attack, they'd know where to concentrate firepower.
44 posted on 01/07/2004 7:57:16 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I would agree that the Pelican would not be the bird carrying SEAL teams to the fight. Most of the airlift capacity we have now is of the "follow-on" variety. I would imagine that the Pelican would be used to get forces and equipment near the theater of operations and farm from the "danger zone". With the exception of that C-17 jump raid into Northern Iraq, the big-money airlift equipment isn't normally gambled on an insertion mission.

Considering a C-5 got shot at today (1/8/04) from ground fire from outside Baghdad Int. and had to make an emergency landing, the USAF has a reason to be risk-adverse at putting their airlift investment in harms way.

45 posted on 01/08/2004 5:02:42 PM PST by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson