Posted on 12/29/2003 8:45:05 AM PST by Sir Gawain
|
Principle Before Party
|
|
Tom DeWeese
|
| Fifty years ago the modern movement to defend the principles of liberty, outlined in the United States Constitution, began. That was when conservatives and libertarians began to stand up to those who advocated government as the answer to the basic questions of life, as opposed to individual responsibility. The new conservatives advocated individual freedom, free markets, entrepreneurship, and limited government intervention into the everyday lives of American families. At the time, the Republican Party was the best vehicle for promoting the ideals of the new movement. It was the party of Robert Taft and, later, Jesse Helms and Ronald Reagan. It was the Party that preached the gospel of limited government and the Judeo/Christian ideals that are the foundation of Western Culture. The problem was the Republican Party was also the home of Nelson Rockefeller and the Eastern Establishment elite who advocated their own plans for a welfare state, much like that of the Democrats, only on a slower, smaller basis. They liked the benefits of the money business could provide, but wanted to use government to keep it in check. It was also a handy tool to control your competition. So a titanic battle between ideologies began for the heart and soul of the Republican Party. Political parties are simply tools for winning elections. The kind of candidates they produce and the policies they advocate are a product of those in control. Conservatives in the middle of the Twentieth Century understood this. They took up the battle cry of “principle before party” and then set out to make sure the Republican Party was true to conservative principles. However, somewhere along the way, conservative principles got watered down with “Republican” policies. The once mighty conservative grassroots activists have been reduced to taken-for-granted pawns, warned to speak no evil of a fellow Republican. Above all, don’t be so childish as to “stand for principle.” Do so at the risk of finding the label “extremist” permanently tattooed to your name. We are warned that the alternative to the Republicans are the devil Democrats – and you know what that means! Big government. Uncontrolled spending. Higher taxes. Greater regulations on business. Assaults on family values. In fear, we comply. Conservatives shuffle their feet, look down at the floor, bleat the party line, accept the “compromises”, and acknowledge their fate on the backbenches. Republicans now have a new agenda. It started with the label of the undefined “compassionate conservatism.” Now, the compassionate Republican Administration has ventured on a new path called “National Greatness” with the express purpose of creating an American empire which seeks to re-draw the map of the Middle East and use American might to force American ideals on others. They believe force should not just be limited to the defense of our country. According to this new policy, big government isn’t bad – it just depends on who is running it. “We can make government great for the American people as long as we’re in charge” goes the Party line. Three years of complete Republican rule have given us a clear understanding of its meaning. Close inspection will show that this is not your father’s GOP. And it’s not conservative! On the domestic front, the Republican Party just forced the passage of a Medicare bill that will cost $7 trillion of unfunded entitlement. According to reports coming from Capitol Hill, Republican leadership in Congress applied unprecedented pressure on GOP members to get it passed so the President would have a major campaign issue in his pocket. According to Congressman Nick Smith of Michigan, there were threats and intimidation for him to swallow his convictions that the bill was bad for America. He was threatened in midnight appeals from House Speaker Dennis Hastert that, should he vote against the bill, his son, now running for Smith’s seat, would never get elected. Rep. Tom Feeney of Florida, after resisting phone calls from President Bush, was told that a no vote would delay his ascent to House leadership by three more years. In the end, only 25 Republicans stood for the conservative principle that government shouldn’t be in the healthcare business and voted against the Medicare bill. Big government just got a whole lot bigger under Republican rule. Remember 1994 when the Republicans gained control of the House of Representatives? One major battle cry was their determination to abolish the Department of Education. Why? The federal government has no business being involved in education, which should be controlled at the local level. That’s a point of fact in the Constitution and a conservative principle. Today, under Republican control, the issue is simply no longer on the agenda. The Bush Administration, under the “No Child Left Behind” Act has created more regulations and more funding for federally controlled curriculum than ever before. The Act itself was basically written by Ted Kennedy. No-Child-Left-Behind is simply the permanent solidification of the failed policies of Goals 2000, School to Work and the Workforce Development Act. As a result, American education is now completely controlled from Washington. The federal education bureaucracy just got a whole lot more powerful under Republican rule. Sustainable Development is the official policy of the Bush Administration. It is a leftover from Bill Clinton and could have been eliminated in preference to reestablishing our Constitutional form of representative government in which the local town councils and county commissioners are empowered to decide local issues. President Bush chose not to take that action. Instead, he chose Sustainable Development, a top-down federal zoning approach designed to restructure American communities to fit the dictates of the United Nation’s Agenda 21 treaty. As a result of Sustainable Development policies, private, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) with specific political agendas are now in (partnership) with elected officials, guiding policy from a central blueprint. As once guaranteed rights under a rule of law are now pulled and stretched to fit the current fad policy, homeowners are no longer confident that their property is secure from new regulations. There is fear that, at any time, their investment (indeed their home) could suddenly be taken at the whim of newly created Sustainable policy. Belief in the American dream is dying under Republican rule. Christianity, the very foundation of Western culture, is being systematically eliminated from the United States. We’ve witnessed the incredible sight of a monument of the Ten Commandments being physically removed from the Alabama Supreme Court at the edict of a federal judge. Both the U.S. and Alabama Constitutions clearly state that the federal government has no jurisdiction in the case. Not only has the Bush Administration stood by and let it happen, it is now considering the prosecutor in the case for a federal judgeship. As a result of that case, actions to remove any sign of the Christian religion from public places have quickened in pace. God is being removed from America under Republican rule. Our nation is being attacked by fanatical terrorists and we must defend against them. We have the U.S. Military, the FBI, the CIA, State and local police. It’s well defined that their job is to defend our borders, coastline, airspace and cities from threats, both inside and out of our borders. Why is a massive new agency, armed with the power to intrude into our homes without a search warrant, necessary? Does the reader remember hearing the term “Homeland Security” prior to September 11, 2001? Where did the term come from? Familiar terms for defending our borders have always been national defense or national security. Where did the term “Homeland” come from? It seems the term has been rattling around the United Nations for some time. And, in fact, in 2000, at the UN’s Millennium Summit, attended by 179 world leaders, all nations present agreed to adopt, without reservation, recommendations for Homeland Security. It was all contained in a document called the Brahimi Report. According to researcher Joan Peros, several paragraphs in the section on Civilian Police are of special note. It calls for member states to increase their numbers of civilian police and to reform and restructure local police forces so they can be used in UN peace operations. It calls for joint exercises and regional training partnerships. Paragraph 124 calls for Member States to designate a single point of contact within their government structures to be responsible for coordinating and managing the provisions of police personnel. In compliance, the United States set up its single point of contact: The Department of Homeland Security. By the way, the German translation of the phrase “Homeland Security” is “Schutz Staffel.” The Nazis shortened it to “SS.” A massive, intrusive cabinet-level agency with power beyond the wildest dreams of Franklin Roosevelt and Lyndon Johnson combined has just been established under Republican rule. The Bush administration put our country back into UNESCO. The Bush Administration is moving forward with plans to put illegal aliens on our already-bankrupt Social Security system. Indeed it wants a full amnesty granted to millions of outlaw aliens who disregarded our rule of law just to sneak in here. Conservatives, Libertarians, Americans who believe that the Constitution was and is the best document yet devised to protect human liberty, it’s time to come out of your trance and begin anew the fight for “principle before party.” It is not wrong for you to oppose these actions. It is not wrong to speak ill of a Party that has lost its way. It is not treason to oppose these outrageous excesses of the Republican Party. Indeed, it may be treason if you do not. Tom DeWeese is the publisher/editor of The DeWeese Report and president of the American Policy Center, a grassroots, activist think tank headquartered in Warrenton, VA. The Center maintains an Internet site at www.americanpolicy.org. |
Conservatives, Libertarians, Americans who believe that the Constitution was and is the best document yet devised to protect human liberty, it’s time to come out of your trance and begin anew the fight for "principle before party." It is not wrong for you to oppose these actions. It is not wrong to speak ill of a Party that has lost its way. It is not treason to oppose these outrageous excesses of the Republican Party. Indeed, it may be treason if you do not.
This ought to get good.
started into the Homeland Security bit
If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy." -- James Madison
Remember RICO? see - THE HUMAN LIFE REVIEW
Power Predicts Genocide And Mass Murder First, the more democracy the less the number of its own people the regime will kill for the reasons given. However, these restraints do not well operate in times of hot or cold war, when the military or intelligence services operate in secret, and in their foreign operations are in effect totalitarian enclaves within a democratic structure. This is because in wartime the democracies largely give the military their head, secrecy prevails, wartime controls over the nation are instituted, and it is an open question whether democracies in wartime retain their full democratic character (consider the internment of Japanese-Americans in concentration camps during World War II, for example), particularly in their foreign operations.
It does not mention government in the dictionary.
" I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them. It is not to inaugurate new programs, but to cancel old ones that do violence to the Constitution, or that have failed in their purpose, or that impose on the people an unwarranted financial burden. I will not attempt to discover whether legislation is 'needed' before I have first determined whether it is constitutionally permissible. And if I should later be attacked for neglecting my constituents' interests, I shall reply that I was informed their main interest is liberty and that in that cause I am doing the very best I can."
--Barry Goldwater, the last Libertarian Republican.
This cannot be stated enough. For those happy with the actions of the Republican party, be glad. It's returning to its roots of big government Whig intrusion. For conservatives, now is the time to find another party. I refuse to be taken for granted by a party whose end game is nothing more than a different version of socialist rule than that of the Democrats. I can't tell you daily how 'thrilled' I have become with the idea that 'we won back the Senate'. Fat lot of good it's done
Thank you George Bush I, Jack Kemp, Bill Bennett, and the rest of the GOP's closeted kumbaya New World Order pansies.
Good post BTW.
Back in '93/94 I read a book called, The Ruling Class: Inside The Imperial Congress, by Eric Felton of the Heritage Foundation. It outlined many problems with Congress at the time. One of the problems was how the Libs ran Congress as an "incumbent machine", first and foremost. Since the Pubs took over, they have been assimilated by this incumbent machine, apparently, overwhelmed by its influence.
I hope I am wrong in saying that the only way to limit the Fed gubmint is to choke the money supply via income tax, if that is ever possible. There was a group of people who were trying to establish, in a legit' way, the invalidity of the ratification of the 16th amendment. I have my doubts. However, if they can prove that, at least, four states did not genuinely ratify that amendment then there is a starting point to reverse the income tax/IRS/withholding/etc., yet only a starting point, IMHO.
Since the Pubs took over, they have been assimilated by this incumbent machine, apparently, overwhelmed by its influence.
Yes, and yet they continue to muck it up and create issues for the other socialist party to re-take the reigns of power. That could reflect the schizophrenic psychology of the party.
"The once mighty conservative grassroots activists have been reduced to taken-for-granted pawns, warned to speak no evil of a fellow Republican. Above all, don’t be so childish as to 'stand for principle.' Do so at the risk of finding the label 'extremist' permanently tattooed to your name."
That's exactly what was done to a few conservatives when there was opposition to at a central party's committee endorsing a RINO well before our state primaries and, true to form, those labels and accusations came up. Just like textbook procedures. Yep, "we won back the Senate"; conservatives are certainly no better off.
I hope I am wrong in saying that the only way to limit the Fed gubmint is to choke the money supply via income tax, if that is ever possible. There was a group of people who were trying to establish, in a legit' way, the invalidity of the ratification of the 16th amendment. I have my doubts. However, if they can prove that, at least, four states did not genuinely ratify that amendment then there is a starting point to reverse the income tax/IRS/withholding/etc., yet only a starting point, IMHO.
Wishful thinking VRWC, it will not happen unless those people run for Congress and win, then change the law. See you (most people) do not PAY their taxes. Their taxes are CONFISCATED by your employer. So how do you CHOOSE not to pay? Of course if they billed you like Visa, NONE OF US would ever send in our payment. But, your employer, for the right to be licensed, will ALWAYS CONFISCATE your taxes for the USG>
...and they are winning.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.