To: 4Liberty
He's also been quick to the sword when Libertarians have called him to defend individual liberty in all personal decisions - immediately asking them if they are on drugs/or in favor legalizing drugs, and etc. right out of the starting gate. Like this statement - which is obviously correct, they DO favor legalization - somehow negates their [more principled] postion on personal liberty relative to the av. Republican's anti-drug war philosophy. (Wm. Buckley - & many other conservatives who publicly support drug legalization - excepted.)
In other words... "I hope they lock him up so I don't have to listen to him insult my party any longer."
55 posted on
12/25/2003 4:51:46 PM PST by
Terpfen
To: Terpfen
So, don't listen to him. No one is making you.
To: Terpfen
"In other words... 'I hope they lock him up so I don't have to listen to him insult my party any longer.' "
Oh, no - I insist he continue broadcasting. I don't see why he can't broadcast from jail.
Inconsistent Conservatives are the limited-government advocate's best friend.
When they twist themselves into pretzels in an attempt to "make sense" in their support arbitrary gov. regulations of personal conduct - they come across as the dreaded "Moderates" Rush loves to bash.
Let em talk.
At least with the Central Planning Board/Nanny state Dems, you KNOW where they are coming from. There is no pretense, there, of a respect for individual freedom or for private propery rights.
114 posted on
12/26/2003 10:18:45 AM PST by
4Liberty
(Unions & Collective Bargaining are for Communists)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson