Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Orangedog
IIRC, the critical failure was the fire proofing that was blown off of the structural componants is what allowed the fire (from the jet fuel and other flamable materials in the buildings) to weaken them enough to cause the pancaking action to happen. I may be in error on that.

Not technically in error, since that was the initial report. Later reports indicated that the fire-proofing was inadequate for the jet-fuel conflagration. Even if it hadn't been blown off, the metal still would have fatigued and the structure still would have fallen. I think the last report I read on the matter indicated that adequate fireproofing still wouldn't have saved the doomed structure; it would only have bought it maybe another hour before collapse.

Still makes me sad to think about it all to this day. What a horrific day that was... I wish they'd just build back the Twin Towers the way they were on September 10th, only one story higher (just to p~ss off the terrorists).

98 posted on 12/23/2003 7:51:44 PM PST by Prime Choice (Americans are a spiritual people. We're happy to help members of al Qaeda meet God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: Prime Choice
I wish they'd just build back the Twin Towers the way they were on September 10th, only one story higher (just to p~ss off the terrorists).

Absolutely! They could even use a conventional interior structure, just as long as the outside was identical to the Twin Towers. The only other change I would make would be anti-aircraft defences on the roof or each building.

119 posted on 12/23/2003 8:28:56 PM PST by Orangedog (Remain calm...all is well! [/sarcasm])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson