Posted on 12/19/2003 4:10:50 PM PST by 45Auto
In '84 I switched from a Combat Commander to an Officers Model. Eventually had it tuned, rounded and Novaked. It always works. If I need 9mm I have a Hi-Power that is tuned and works like a Swiss watch.
In serious social situations it is usually the person with the gun and not the gun that makes the difference.
Glock uses a "trigger safety"..
It is incorporated into the trigger, and thusly, while the weapon will not go off if dropped, etc., an "itchy" trigger finger WILL fire the gun.
The standard .45 cal has a "thumb" safety that has to be manually operated before the gun will fire.
Additionally, the standard .45 cal has a "grip" safety that requires a full, firm hand grip on the pistol in order to fire it.
I personally consider all Glocks as UNSAFE.
I do not recommend them to my freinds or relatives.
A child CAN fire a Glock.
The standard .45 has the proper safety features required in a handgun in my opinion, and the Glock does not.
I have to almost agree with Lurker in the above post. What a waste of glocks resources. But as stated I still have to confirm my initial thoughts with use vs what someone else in a gunrag tests for me. You know that too....
Stay Safe GR !!!
If they really wanted to 'accomodate' .45 shooters, why didn't they just make it a single stack weapon using the proven Glock action? What's the point in inventing a "new" .45 caliber round? What was wrong with the 'old' one?
While I'm not a personal fan of it, Glock has managed to secure a huge portion of the market with the action they invented. If Glock shooters wanted a smaller version of the pistol chambered in .45 ACP, that's what they should have given them.
But hey, that's just me.
Merry Christmas my friend.
Regards,
L
A Glock is almost like carrying a 1911 with the safety off, all the time, IMHO.
I've had the same Commander for the last 15 years I think. IMO, it's the finest personal defense handgun one can buy. It's not perfect, and yea Glock makes a nice gun, but it seems to me that Glock is trying to make something for everyone and this new gun just proves my point.
Who's going to make ammo for this thing? How many police departments are actually going to issue it? That's where Glocks market is. And PD's aren't going to buy the millions of rounds necessary to make this thing commercially viable.
Call me old fashioned Trav, but I just don't see how this things going to work. If I want to put a .45 caliber hole in something, I already own a well proven design which functions as close to flawlessly as any gun I've ever owned.
I'm not Glock quality or engineering here, I know they're decent guns. I'm just questioning their judgement.
L
I think Aston wanted his own version of a "caliber" like the 357SIG or 40 S&W (aka Short & Whimpy)............thus the trendy 45GAP..........all smoke and mirrors. But of course I am a member of the gun of the month club thus will get one to line my gun safe with and test fer myself !........... 1911A1 rules !
Stay Safe and call em like ya see em friend !
I have to respectfully disagree with you on this one Travis. I wouldn't compare it to a redhawk or model 29, but I would compare it to something like a smith 66 or taurus 85. If the latter two have eleven pound triggers, then the ergonomics sure make them "feel" lighter.
It seems to me that most of these new calibers are attemtping to do what the .45 ACP has done for years. First it was the 9mm's; pushing them faster and faster.
Then we got .357 Sig. Let's face it, that one was kind of a flop. Nice round, but the .45 made an even bigger hole, and you didn't have to spend 3 bucks a round for factory ammo.
Then we got .40 S & W. Hell, the company admitted they were trying to get .45 ACP results in a smaller package for the LE market.
Now this one comes on the market. An attempt to be a .45 in a shorter cartridge. Why bother?
I guess I'm getting a bit cranky in middle age, but it seems to me that Glock could have solved this problem by making a single stack built around their already well received action. But, what the hell do I know.
Hey, let me know if that Gun Of The Month club you're in needs any new members. I may bitch a bit, but I'm darned appreciative of finding things into my hands to play with.
Merry Christmas,
L
At the TOP of my list of guns I kick myself for selling is my Colt ltwt Commander! Slicked up, beavertail, extended safety, checkered forestrap. What a dummy to sell that great pistol!
Or have it snag on something while it's being holstered. Etc.
Glocks are perfectly safe secure in your holster, and presented in your hand. But the transitions from holster to presentation and reverse provide some unique....challenges. About the same as if you never used the safety on a 1911 and just left it chambered and cocked at all times. Safe in your holster, safe in your hand....but going from on to the other...WATCH OUT!
Merry Xmas to you also Lurker. You stay safe and get a little trigger time if ya get some free days this week.
Do ya remember the toy dart pistols we had as kids. The one with the rubber tip that stuck to yer little sisters forehead. Find one of those and pull the trigger. Now , unload, clear and safe a glock, and pull the trigger.......same friggin spoing spoing spoing noise. The gun not yer little sister........:o)
Stay safe Bro !
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.