To: jmcclain19
It would empower Bush were he to run against a more credible candidate in the general election.
A Bush blow-out over Dean will only result in more conspiracy cr*p about Bush being "selected not elected."
2 posted on
12/18/2003 2:38:41 PM PST by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: jmcclain19
This is one crazy dude or he thinks Americans are stupid.
Maybe most liberals are liars and that is why they like him.I dont know of anything else that would attract them unless it is jist pure hatred for Bush.
3 posted on
12/18/2003 2:39:35 PM PST by
gunnedah
To: jmcclain19
Thus, last October in contrast to his current stance Deans position was support for an attack on Iraq, even without U.N. "permission." Hey now, let's not bring up the facts. Dean has every right to change his position based on hindsight and slutting himself to the anti-war crowd if he so desires. Who cares what his position actually was? He can change if it makes a difference in getting the nomination or not.
To: jmcclain19
Hillary must have instructed MSNBC to attack Dean. It's turning into a full-court press.
I especially loved this bit: We need to somehow figure out how we are going to de-corporatize medicine, he observed. Making everything bigger, more corporate, and better organized and more efficient does not lead to the kind of spiritual quality that we need in our lives.
6 posted on
12/18/2003 2:47:32 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: jmcclain19
No doubt about it...ol' Howard the Dean is one bad egg!
7 posted on
12/18/2003 3:00:23 PM PST by
Prime Choice
(Leftist opinions may be free, but I still feel like I'm getting ripped off every time I receive one.)
To: jmcclain19
Is there some talented person out there who can photoshop Dean in a tinfoil hat?
To: jmcclain19
When is Dean going to pull his head out of his butt?
11 posted on
12/18/2003 4:12:55 PM PST by
bdeaner
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson