Recording Stupid Leftist Comments (On the Capture of Hussein) for Posterity

The American Partisan ^ | 14 December, 2003 | J. King

[The Right Stuff]

Okay, folks, here is our chance to record - for all time - the dimwitted comments made by leftwingers in the U.S. regarding the fall of the evil dictator, Saddam Hussein.

Imagine that you are in occupied Europe in 1945, and it's your duty to get collaborators commentary out - written down on your trusty Underwood.

It's our duty and our privilege. Write on.

Here's a sampling of what I've found:
Washington (com)Post writer Robin Wright, "this isn't going to transform the situation"
Time's Joe Klein, "another terrorist attack on America would completely change this dynamic."
Presidential Candidate Dennis Kucinich, "we must...end the occupation of Iraq"
Presidential Candidate John F'ing Kerry, "It's a good day for Iraqis, but Americans are still going to die."
Dan Rather, "think of how poor Saddam must feel" paraphrased.
CNN - "the Iraqis don't care, there's not enough electricy and there are gas lines." Also, "why did it take so long?"
MSNBC - "the insurgents are too well organized to quit."
Campbell Brown - "This should help President Bush."
NPR - repeated the no-gas, no-water line
Paula Zahn and Aaron Brown - "Bush had better not gloat."
Yasser Arafat, taking a page away from Tom Daschle, is "saddened."
Evan Thomas, he of the infamous "thrice married shlub" slam against Rush Limbaugh, writes that "in a land where pride and dignity mean anything, the images (of Saddam being examined by US military doctors) are clearly intended to shame."
DUH, Evan, perhaps they were meant to show that - unlike Saddam and his tree shredder buddies - US doctors humanely treat even our worst enemies.

And then there are our friends at Democratic Underground. They inhabit a true Middle Earth, rife with demonical conspiracies devilishly enacted by that sub-human Neanderthal George W. Bush. How Bush can be so stupid and yet so devious remains to be explained.

According to our DU buddies, Bush was "jealous of Clinton, and with Wes Clark on his way to Sarajevo in order to testify against Milosevic, Bush had to nab Hussein."
Other theories posit that the exuberant street dancing by Iraqis, "appeared staged."
And, that the capture was an elaborate "photo op."

One almost has to feel sorry for such types. At least we can offer them a one way ticket to the destination of their choice - France?

[.38sw]

GASP! The Iraqis still don't have enough water and power! That, after all, is far more important than stopping the torture and summary executions, isn't it?

[Mr. Buzzcut]

I'm afraid if we were to collect and post all the inane comments from the bedwetters FR would quickly run out of disk space!

[ItisaReligionofPeace]

"the Iraqis don't care, there's not enough electricy and there are gas lines."

I can vouch for the latest CNN line. I just heard it on the Aaron Brown show. (he is unbearable).

[The Right Stuff]

you're right, of course, but it is great fun!

[AngrySpud]

Leftist apologists: "Sadaam may have been an a$$hole, but he was OUR a$$hole!"

[alancarp]

This is a great idea -- even individually, these lines are inane and impossibly stupid. But shown together in one place? Looks like organized, willful, intentional stupidity on a grand scale.

So speaking of that, have we heard from Tim Robbins or Babs Streisand yet?

[somemoreequalthanothers]

I recall hearing months ago that we had extended the power grid to places it had never been.

[Doohickey]

WE GOT HIM (children and minorities hardest hit)

[condi2008]

Thanks for recording these in one location. I've been wondering what those loosers could possibly have to say, but of course, they have also ceased to surprise me...

[my_pointy_head_is_sharp]

With all this talk about DU, I had to go over and take a peak. They're angry that Saddam was captured. They're angry???

Can someone please explain to me why they're angry that the Butcher of Baghdad has been captured.

[armymarinemom]

Oh man. A good day for the country is a bad day for these Yahoos.

[Guillermo]

What CNN was saying right off the bat was insane..."Iraqis will not care," "The Iraqi's will not believe it's Saddam."

[cwb]

I think Chris Matthews is having a breakdown in trying to negate any success from this news. Things like "Saddam was only a threat to his own people" and that "Bush has to get back to the war on terrorism and protecting the American people" are only meant to distract from this success.

Matthews is also thrilled at the prospect of an International Tribunal so we can get to the bottom of America's complicity in Saddam's tyranny. What really ticked me off was when he and Gephardt were commenting on the American soldier who was checking Saddam over for head lice and mouth sores. Instead of making a distinction between the compassion of US soldiers and Americans during a time of war, these two dopes start talking about how all Americans should get the same free healthcare Saddam was getting. Liberals do hate this country.

[BenLurkin]

"in a land where pride and dignity mean anything, the images (of Saddam being examined by US military doctors) are clearly intended to shame."

It doesn't look as though we shaved Saddam's mustache when we shaved his beard. THAT would have been intended to humiliate

(Which would have suited me just fine, but the people in charge of our armed forces probably have better judgment than do I.)

[Dan from Michigan]

Because it's harder for them to win THEIR war. Their political war(and that's what it is) against Bush.

[witnesstothefall]

I hereby rechristen DU the Rathole, where dictators and their defenders alike find sanctuary.

[Faraday]

That's "women and minorities hardest hit." We "do IT FOR the children." Gotta keep our bumper stickers straight--can't confuse da masses, doncha know.

[Mr. Buzzcut]

Monday should be interesting. Am wondering if the Bush Haters at work will put aside their hatred long enough to behave like normal Americans.