Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: raybbr
What's that got to do with anything? Bush signed it. If he'd had any thought to do his duty as president to uphold the Constitution, he would have vetoed it.

Bush is done.

Yeah right, 95% of the people don't care about CFR. He signed it because of the politics involved. Like it or not that is the real world.

Justices Breyer and Ginsburg are Clinton's legacy, and hey if you want couple more Ginsburgs or Breyers on SCOTUS, that's your right to have. Personally I do not.

11 posted on 12/11/2003 3:02:43 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Dane
Yeah right, 95% of the people don't care about CFR. He signed it because of the politics involved. Like it or not that is the real world.

That is because it has not fully soaked into the American psyche yet. But when if does, things are going to get real ugly.

13 posted on 12/11/2003 3:05:02 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Dane
if=it
16 posted on 12/11/2003 3:05:40 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Dane
"Justices Breyer and Ginsburg are Clinton's legacy"


Yes, but O'Connor is Reagan's and Souter is Bush Sr.'s. I believe that Reagan may have been mislead by certain advisers, as was Eisenhower. But I cannot extend the same "excuse" to Bush Sr. and am not too sure that I have any reason to believe that W. in his second term, will do any better than his father.


22 posted on 12/11/2003 3:14:12 AM PST by David Isaac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson