[onyx]

To: ModernDayCato
I know exactly what kind of judges the Democrats will install. I prefer to take my chances with Bush and the Republicans. I also know that Dean or any of the other Democrat candidates would be a disaster for America. No thanks, I'll stand by Bush even if I hate some of his decisions.

108 posted on 12/10/2003 8:45:55 PM EST by Jim Robinson (All your ZOT are belong to us.)

[arasina]

I agree with everything stated in Jim's post, except for his tagline. :o)

[baxter999]

"I prefer to take my chances with Bush"

What is all this taking chances and gambling away of my constitutional rights? Don't Jim Rob and the rest of you Bush supporters get it? Take a shot, gamble, hope, pray, take my chances, etc.? Is this really all you've got to offer?

Golly gee, we couldn't actually expect Bush to have used his constitutional power of veto, could we? I mean it's so certain and easy. Where's the fun in that? WWHD? (What Would Hillary Do?) I'll bet she and the NY RedTimes and the Washington Pravda would have pouted, and we Republicans just can't have that now can we? Oh the horror - the horror!

[WOSG]

I know exactly what kind of judges the Democrats will install. I prefer to take my chances with Bush and the Republicans. I also know that Dean or any of the other Democrat candidates would be a disaster for America. No thanks, I'll stand by Bush even if I hate some of his decisions. - Jim Robinson

Great comment. The Democrat-nominated Judges were 100% bad. The Republican-nominated Judges were 4 good, 3 bad, or 58% good on (2 of the bad are known RINOs).

Quit bashing our wobbly friends, they are not the problem: the ENEMY is right there, leering at us and getting no negative reaction. save your energy and send a note to your least favorite liberal for a change, and tell how they destroyed freedom.