I would love to see a genuine portrayal of Reagan set to film -- Reagan: A Life in Letters would be a fantastic basis for a script. But who is going to write, produce and direct it when all of Hollywood is a cesspool of Leftist whackos? Anyone, anyone?
1 posted on
12/06/2003 1:32:54 PM PST by
bdeaner
To: bdeaner
The movie tries to give the impression Reagan did not even know his own national security adviser, Robert C. (Bud) McFarlane, in 1986 -- a harbinger of the Alzheimer's disease that afflicted the president after he left office. Even without this calumny, Reagan is shown drifting from one mishap to another as an addled president advised by rogues. What is ironic about this, is that anyone reading books written by former Clinton insiders would see that He is the President who didn't really make the decisions. George Steffawhatshisface unknowingly I am sure, reveals that in his book.
2 posted on
12/06/2003 1:42:39 PM PST by
ladyinred
(The Left have blood on their hands!)
To: bdeaner
I think Novak should recieve some sort of civilian "Purple Heart" award for even having the guts to sit through such a film from beginning to end. I cancelled "Showtime" after their hit piece on Clarence Thomas some years back.
3 posted on
12/06/2003 1:43:02 PM PST by
Burkeman1
To: bdeaner
NO conservative, Republican, or American citizen with any love of country will ever be portrayed favorably by Hollywood. Those days are gone forever. Get used to it.
4 posted on
12/06/2003 1:44:01 PM PST by
Old Sarge
(Go Army!! Beat Navy!!!)
To: bdeaner
SeeBS has invented a whole new film genre: the mockumentally. Great editorial.
5 posted on
12/06/2003 1:48:49 PM PST by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: bdeaner
I wonder how Babs Streisand would feel if someone produced a derogatory movie about her son who is suffering from AIDS. How uncompassionate that would be...
To: bdeaner
The Reagans provides a great example of the next movie to be made. How about if Ann Coulter writes 'The Clintons'. Laura Ingraham can play Hilary, and Rush can play Bill. Think that'd be any less biased or agenda driven?
Dan
15 posted on
12/06/2003 2:28:22 PM PST by
Scannall
(Just another dumb hick without a brain in his head.)
To: bdeaner
I would love to see a genuine portrayal of Reagan set to film -- Reagan: A Life in Letters would be a fantastic basis for a script. But who is going to write, produce and direct it when all of Hollywood is a cesspool of Leftist whackos? Anyone, anyone? "Tis a consumation devoutly to be wished."
If I was directing that film the major moment would be this:
"Mr. Gorbachev, TEAR DOWN THIS WALL!"
That was the beginning of the end for the old evil empire.
29 posted on
12/06/2003 4:47:20 PM PST by
LibKill
(You are not sheeple. Refuse to be clipped.)
To: bdeaner
Mel Gibson might be willing to do an accurate portrayal.
34 posted on
12/06/2003 7:49:01 PM PST by
CyberAnt
(America .. the LIGHT of the World)
To: bdeaner
A better source would have been Reagan: A Life in Letters, a remarkable book published this year containing 834 pages of mostly hand-written letters by Ronald Wilson Reagan.Bravo. I'm getting this for Christmas. Is it o.k. to say, "Christmas", or is it "Sparkle Season"? ;)
44 posted on
12/07/2003 12:11:33 AM PST by
thesummerwind
(like painted kites, those days and nights, they went flyin' by)
To: bdeaner
bump for the time at hand
46 posted on
06/15/2004 9:30:25 AM PDT by
Sybeck1
(Kerry: how can we trust him with our money, if Teresa won't trust him with hers!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson