Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives Want FDR Replaced With Reagan on Dimes
TBO.com ^ | 12/05/03 | Erica Werner

Posted on 12/05/2003 1:51:13 AM PST by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 12/05/2003 1:51:14 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Picture that...


2 posted on 12/05/2003 1:54:22 AM PST by Prime Choice (Conservative: One who doesn't believe that turning the U.S. into a third-world nation is 'progress'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
Wonderful!
3 posted on 12/05/2003 1:55:15 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I'm all for this kind of "change"...I'm sick of looking at FDR.
4 posted on 12/05/2003 2:00:03 AM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Supporters of the "Ronald Reagan Dime Act" said Roosevelt and his government-expanding New Deal represented decades past, ...

And besides, the Republicans now have their own government-expanding New Dealer. (No, I don't mean Reagan.)

5 posted on 12/05/2003 2:08:30 AM PST by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
Which has absolutely nothing to do with this story.
6 posted on 12/05/2003 2:10:15 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I'd rather see Reagan on a $1 coin, a big one that looks like a buck and can't be mistaken for a quarter.
7 posted on 12/05/2003 2:12:55 AM PST by jaykay (It'll always be Operation Infinite Justice to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Yes it does. I quoted a line in the story that seems quite ironic.
8 posted on 12/05/2003 2:13:07 AM PST by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
The story has to do with FDR & President Reagan. Nothing, or no one else.
9 posted on 12/05/2003 2:24:33 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The story has to do with taking FDR off the dime and putting Ronald Reagan on it. I'm all for honoring Reagan. He earned it. However, we can't justify taking FDR off the dime by criticizing him for something the Republicans are currently doing.
10 posted on 12/05/2003 2:30:10 AM PST by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jaykay
Eisenhower is on the dollar coin -- the big one, not the Woman of the Year Dollar.

Ike's on the buck, Lincoln's on the penny. That's two Republicans.

FDR is on the dime, Jefferson on the nickel, JFK on the half.

But before you think that the 'Rats have a lead, remember that Washington (quarter) and Ben Franklin were both Federalists, which, with the Whig Party intervening, was the direct ancestor of the Republican Party.

Susan B. Anthony doesn't count, since the coin was massively and humiliatingly repudiated -- so much for Jimmy Carter's effort to kiss up to the women's vote. And Sacajawea wasn't even a citizen of the United States; she was a member of an Indian nation. (Shoshoni, I think.) The god Mercury was, well, a deity and above politics, and so are Lady Liberty and the eagle. The Indian heads on the nickel and the small gold coins pre-1933 fall in the same category as Sacajawea: non-citizens.

11 posted on 12/05/2003 2:33:41 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The story has to do with FDR & President Reagan. Nothing, or no one else.

Kind of. It also has to do with Republicans wrapping themselves in Reagan's mantle even as they repudiate it by spending wildly, so Moonman has a point.

12 posted on 12/05/2003 2:40:27 AM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
I haven't seen one of those big Eisenhower Silver Dollars in years. Now that was a dollar coin.
13 posted on 12/05/2003 2:42:32 AM PST by jaykay (It'll always be Operation Infinite Justice to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
I don't think that Ike coins have been made since the 1980s.

Richard Nixon and LBJ never got any currency.

Ronald Reagan could replace Benjamin Franklin since he was never elected President.

14 posted on 12/05/2003 2:45:06 AM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jaykay
Yes, the ones I used to carry were just tin, but there were a few silver ones minted. I still have a base one somewhere, tucked in as an example with some silver Morgans and Peace dollars.
15 posted on 12/05/2003 2:46:11 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Grut
Moonman's point and obviously yours, is to inject something into this discussion which has nothing to do with the topic of the article.
16 posted on 12/05/2003 2:48:31 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Ronald Reagan could replace Benjamin Franklin since he was never elected President.

Well, that would be the half-dollar, presently occupied by Jack Kennedy with the eagle from the Great Seal on the reverse, which I like a lot. Better to put Ronnie on a re-issued Big Buck, and melt all those Susan B.'s and Sacajaweas down as a failed coin type. Let the collectors grab a few examples, and then off to the smelter with them!

17 posted on 12/05/2003 2:48:38 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
Excuse me. Does anyone have a photo of a Roosevelt dime? I don't think I have ever seen one given I never have any money left after paycheck taxes; thanks in part to his nanny-state policies.
18 posted on 12/05/2003 3:08:23 AM PST by 101st-Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Geez Louise, they're not allowed to put a living person on a US coin. And Reagan is still alive ... officially. Can't they at least wait until he's dead?
19 posted on 12/05/2003 3:09:33 AM PST by DonQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Moonman's point and obviously yours, is to inject something into this discussion which has nothing to do with the topic of the article.

And that's the first time that's ever happened on a thread here.

20 posted on 12/05/2003 3:16:04 AM PST by Cagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson