1 posted on
12/02/2003 10:06:24 AM PST by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: kattracks
"Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past" Time for another Howard Dean led Two Minute Hate...
2 posted on
12/02/2003 10:08:15 AM PST by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: kattracks
I'm sorry to speak of Dean in this manner, but what an asshole!
3 posted on
12/02/2003 10:08:17 AM PST by
TommyDale
To: kattracks
HA HA! Rupert will squash you like a bug Deano!
5 posted on
12/02/2003 10:09:47 AM PST by
luckodeirish
(Feel His Joy!)
To: kattracks
It looks like Dean is a tad bit unstable...
6 posted on
12/02/2003 10:09:50 AM PST by
KevinDavis
(Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
To: kattracks
To: kattracks
Go Dean Go!!
What do they say about idiots who like to talk? Let them go ahead and don't interrupt.
8 posted on
12/02/2003 10:10:09 AM PST by
demlosers
To: kattracks
To argue that he wants the American people to get their information from more than just "one political spectrum" and then to urge abolition of conservative media outlets is totally illogical.
The man is out to lunch, totally.
To: kattracks
Newsmax Title - "Dean: I'd 'Break Up' Fox News"
Article - "I don't want to answer whether I would break up Fox or not." - Dean
LOL. Hey, did I get taken for a ride here, or what? ;-)
11 posted on
12/02/2003 10:11:37 AM PST by
Scenic Sounds
(Pero treinta miles al resto.)
To: kattracks
"What I'm going to do is appoint people to the FCC that believe democracy depends on getting information from all portions of the political spectrum, not just one." Wow. Dean's going to break up See-BS.
Dean should be applauding Fox, not breaking it up. And besides, isn't that "censorship"?
13 posted on
12/02/2003 10:13:57 AM PST by
Colonel_Flagg
("I keep myself in a constant state of utter confusion." - Self)
To: kattracks
A more insightful followup would have been, "Are you planning on breaking up Time-Warner as well?"
16 posted on
12/02/2003 10:15:25 AM PST by
HarleyD
To: kattracks
Dean shot back, "On ideological grounds, absolutely yes." At that point Dean seemed to sense that he had gone too far and began to equivocate, saying, "I don't want to answer whether I would break up Fox or not."
Too late... you're already on record, Howie.
19 posted on
12/02/2003 10:16:22 AM PST by
Lunatic Fringe
(I'm normally not a praying man, but if you're up there, please save me Superman.)
To: kattracks
good luck, deanjerk
23 posted on
12/02/2003 10:16:53 AM PST by
petercooper
(Proud VRWC Neanderthal)
To: kattracks
Dean would adopt Colmes and hang Hannity, that would be his first priority.
24 posted on
12/02/2003 10:17:47 AM PST by
cynicom
To: kattracks
Apparently these are OK: ABC,CBS,NBC,PBS,MSNBC,CNN,CNN Headline News,CSpan.
But Fox is one too many.
26 posted on
12/02/2003 10:18:32 AM PST by
gitmo
(Stability cannot be purchased at the expense of liberty. -GWB)
To: kattracks
Mr. Dean....How about NPR???...Huh...More than one station there. Are you going to break up NPR???? Mister Dean
To: kattracks
The fact that he singled out FOX News (as opposed to companies like Viacom, Time-Warner, ClearChannel, etc.) shows just what his agenda really is.
On the other hand, he raises a very interesting point about the application of antitrust law to media conglomerates. I have a hard time accepting the notion of multiple-media ownership in a nation where some industries are prohibited by law from doing the exact same thing.
29 posted on
12/02/2003 10:19:24 AM PST by
Alberta's Child
("To freedom, Alberta, horses . . . and women!")
To: kattracks
Can you imagine the media firestorm if Bush ever suggested - even jokingly - that he was going to try to break up news organizations hostile to his administration? But here we have the Democratic front-runner openly musing about breaking up Fox - and admitting that he fantasizes about suppressing Fox because of its ideology - and it will barely create a ripple in the national media.
31 posted on
12/02/2003 10:20:35 AM PST by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: kattracks
Doesn't Murdoch only own around 8% of the market share?
33 posted on
12/02/2003 10:21:18 AM PST by
ItsOurTimeNow
(Criswell - "And remember, my friends, future events such as these will affect you in the future.")
To: kattracks
Smash the FCC!
There's a slogan to run with.
35 posted on
12/02/2003 10:21:23 AM PST by
headsonpikes
(Spirit of '76 bttt!)
To: kattracks
Heck, why stop with FOX News?
</sarcasm alert>
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
