Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eastbound
From what I understand, 'equal protection' does not apply to state's that already have gun-control laws. (Doctrine of Non-Incorporation). That is why I suggested incorporating 2A after the manner Roe vs Wade did in over-riding the doctrine.

I don't understand your point. Roe V Wade (abortion) was decided on the "penumbral" right of privacy, not equal protection. Do you perhaps mean Brown vs. Board? (School integration), which was an equal protection deal. In Brown there was no question of "incorporation" since applying equal protection is an integral part of the 14th. amendment. Most so called "incorporation" has been under the due process clause of the 14th, because an earlier Supreme Court bit the big one and ruled that "priveleges and immunities" meant only those things unique to national citizenship, such as the right to travel between states, or the right to travel the navigable waterways which are under federal jurisdiction. This in spite of the fact that the authors and sponsers of the 14th amendment stated on multiple occasions that what they meant by "priveleges and immunities of citizens of the United States" were those rights protected by the first 8 amendments to the Constitution.

98 posted on 12/01/2003 3:22:15 PM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato
Okay, thanks a bunch for clearing that up. There are times when I look for the logic of the court and it is like listening to Abbott and Costello do their 'Who's On First' routine.
101 posted on 12/01/2003 3:28:51 PM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson