Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/01/2003 2:17:56 AM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sarcasm
Hundreds of counties have followed Superior's path, and their industrial parks and new buildings sit empty.

We've had similar things like this, too-- I call it "government bureaucrats find it easy to spend other people's money..."

If there were a profit to be made, private businesses would already be filling the niche'.

2 posted on 12/01/2003 3:02:57 AM PST by backhoe (--30--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
Why rural depopulation is a liberal policy.
3 posted on 12/01/2003 3:31:04 AM PST by Vigilanteman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
"The other force is the Wal-Mart effect. The day a Wal-Mart comes into a midsize town, Mr. Blauvelt said, the town newspaper loses about 40 percent of its advertising revenue. But at least the paper has a fighting chance to stay in business. For local stores, it is no contest."

Ah ha ....... The old Wal-Mart effect.

Amazing that Wal-Marts would locate to an area that has consistantly lost poulation since the 50's.

They will no doubt be bankrupt very shortly.

Yawwwwwwwnnnn.

4 posted on 12/01/2003 3:53:51 AM PST by G.Mason (If they are Democrats they are expendable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
bump for later
5 posted on 12/01/2003 4:11:39 AM PST by Skooz (We keep you alive to serve this ship. Row well, and live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
The same thing is happening in Iowa, to a lesser degree.
6 posted on 12/01/2003 4:24:17 AM PST by Iowa Granny (One man with courage makes a majority..... Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
Forty years ago, the poorest counties in America were located in southern Appalachia, and to a lesser extent, the Mississippi Delta and the Ozarks. What happened in these areas was that, as the coal mines played out, subsistence farming became less desirable, and cotton production became mechanized, rural whites and blacks migrated to the North. The rural Great Plains will stabilize when the excess population migrates out of the region. As long as cotton, wheat, corn, and cattle remain viable commodities, people will produce them. If it takes fewer people to do so, or if counties or school districts must consolidate, so be it.
9 posted on 12/01/2003 2:23:51 PM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
What's the education level for these folks? What type of skills do they possess?
10 posted on 12/01/2003 2:29:07 PM PST by KantianBurke (Don't Tread on Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
Snips from the article:
Like most of the rural Great Plains, Nuckolls County is old, white and relatively poor. One of four households makes less than $15,000 a year, according to census figures. One of four people is older than 65. Most of the jobs are tied to farming, though the hospital is the biggest employer, with 148 workers. The county is 99 percent white.

...They put together a PowerPoint presentation, boasting of a union-free labor force in a town where a solid three-bedroom, two-bath home sells for less than $50,000.

"Our greatest asset is the psychological loyalty of people who left here," said Dr. Don Crilly, a retired vascular surgeon who returned to Superior 10 years ago from the San Francisco Bay area. He and his wife, Sylvia, moved into the biggest house in town, a plantation-style mansion that had been owned by Dr. Crilly's father. The town welcomed them, they said. They were charmed by the easy pace, the friendships, the lack of cynicism.

A place like this sounds like a good prospect for a guy like myself to RETIRE TO.

In some ways, it fits - generally - the kind of county I'm looking for:
* Rural - completely away from _any_ city of any size. The "middle of nowhere" is great if you're an avid motorcyclist, as I am.
* Likely quite conservative. Need I say more?
* Homogeneous (the county is 99% white) - not much "diversity" here. That's _exactly_ what I'm looking for (sorry if that offends you).
* Cheap - $50k for a 3-bedroom, 2-bath house? You can't buy a garage for that around here.
* Near medical care - having a hospital nearby is certainly a consideration when you're aging.

I could sell out where I am now (northern Fairfield County, Connecticut), take the one-time capital gains exemption on the sale of my home, move to a county like this, buy a retirement home for a fraction of the proceeds I reap from the sale of my (older, in-need-of-work) my current home, and invest the balance (which I will certainly need as a single, retired guy for my remaining years).

I suspect there are a great many more soon-to-be-retirees like me looking to find a "place away" from what American society has become (degenerated to?). Something that hints toward the life many remember growing up in the 1950's.

Case in point: myself. I grew to age 10 in a small, rural Connecticut town, with farmer's fields just recently abandoned, separated by stonewalls, in a house my dad (a carpenter) built himself on land selling for $800 an acre. Today, those former field are overgrown with trees (the young people of today probably have no inkling of the open fields they once were), populated with enormous homes selling in the $700,000+ price range.

I can't "go home" again to the rural Weston of my youth. It no longer exists.

But I _could_ go "home" to a new-found rural community such as Superior, with little regret or looking back.

Cheers!
- John
P.S. Another thought (off-the-wall, perhaps): if the Islamics ever succeed in smuggling and detonating a nuke in an American city, watch the "middle of nowhere" places like this fill up across the country like rain barrels in a flood...

11 posted on 12/01/2003 3:39:24 PM PST by Fishrrman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
pockets of hard poverty amid large agribusinesses supported by taxpayers.

The first and last time the N. Y. Times gave - or pretended to give - a rat's rear end about the American taxpayer.

15 posted on 12/01/2003 4:43:15 PM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
He has no children...

I think this is pretty typical. Many folks in areas like that didn't go out and do drugs during the 70's, but they bought into some of the no-child mentality of the times.

I would suspect a lot of them in this area were German Catholics, who had probably been cranking out families of 7-12 children prior to Vatican II. The problem is that when the population drops, a place becomes dreary and dull. And then when foreigners (Mexicans, Arabs, you name it) move in, it simply becomes - well, foreign.

I hope you all do realize that, if it were not for immigration, we would have the same negative birth rate that Europe has. Don't listen to the NY Times and the Packard Foundation (major Zero Population Growth advocates).

When are native born Americans going to start having children again?

16 posted on 12/01/2003 4:47:40 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
We should end farm subsidies for farms over a certain size or income level. I see no reason on earth why Cargill or ADM should be getting my tax dollars for growing food that they're gonna do anyway.

End farm subsidies now!
21 posted on 12/01/2003 6:12:49 PM PST by Herodotus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
The students said they thought there was a plot among the adults in town to keep young people out and maintain Superior as a retirement community. The adults say just the opposite: They are desperate for new people, especially the young.
If they are like most people in similar circumstances, they are desperate for younger people just like them. Hence the catch.

-Eric

33 posted on 12/02/2003 5:33:53 PM PST by E Rocc (You might be a liberal if.....a proctologist helps you figure out where your head is at.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sarcasm
"You come to us and tell us that the great cities are in favor of the gold standard; we reply that the great cities rest upon our broad and fertile prairies. Burn down your cities and leave our farms, and your cities will spring up again as if by magic; but destroy our farms and the grass will grow in the streets of every city in the country."--(William Jennings Bryan's "Cross of Gold" Speech July 9, 1896, at the Democratic National Convention, Chicago)

Well, times certainly seem to have changed!

37 posted on 12/06/2003 4:17:35 PM PST by Gritty ("Giving leaders enough power to create "social justice" gives them power to destroy all-Tom Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson