To: Protagoras
Cop out answer. If the judicial decision were just about privacy it would have changed all of those concerns.
This was an activist endorsement of sodomy with whatever excuse it took. The Supreme Court is not infalible and even overturned its own earlier decision (different judges).
The Supreme Court has changed it opinion on a number of decisions throughout the years.
52 posted on
11/26/2003 10:38:47 AM PST by
weegee
To: weegee
No wonder (and I am NOT JUSTIFYING IT AS MORAL), that the islamofascist fundamentalists are attacking America and hate us/see us as hopelessly corrupt, satanic and sinful.
53 posted on
11/26/2003 10:40:44 AM PST by
AmericanInTokyo
(NORTH KOREA is a DANGEROUS CANCER in late stages; we still only meditate and take herbal medicines)
To: weegee
I didn't cop out a bit. I make my points, you make yours.
I don't particularly care why the court made this decision. I am not a fan of most court decisions. This one may be correct for all the wrong reasons.
My point is only this, consensual sex between adults in private is not a legitimate government function. The proper role of Government in a free society is to defend rights. Period.
I'm not interested in violent force based theocracies.
55 posted on
11/26/2003 10:51:05 AM PST by
Protagoras
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson