Replies

What I REALLY want to know from some of the nutjob conspiracy freaks is -

- IF THIS indeed was suposed to be a professional hit, WHY wasn't an automatic weapon or at least a semi-automatic weapon used instead of a cheap bolt-action rifle?

AS it was, one of three shots missed - and that number very well could have been 3 of 3 if the car had started to swerve/weave side-to-side as an avoidance manuever that day. A semi-auto could have allowed several more shots to have been squeezed off in short order - leading me to believe this was a half-*ssed 'hit job' if it was really intended to end Kennedy's life ...

Unacceptable answers as to why a semi-auto wasn't used are in the vein of "he wanted to minimize collateral damage to other persons in the car by uisng a more accurate rifle" since Connally was almost killed too in this effort that killed Kennedy ...

A good point, and one of the reasons that I said I think Oswald was probably a lone nut with a gun and a grudge.

I'm not a "conspiracy nutjob"- but then, if I were a nutjob, would I know it?

Hmmmmm...

"Nutjob, odd ball, freak."

Sigh.

Underspace Jim, I really must object. This is just enough name-calling from you and others, you are certainly not alone in this.

Is it really necessary to insult those who will not bow down to the WC?

A majority of Americans have questions about this issue, and no amount of brow-beating is going to change that fact. All you are doing is showing how little you know about the rules of debating.

It's very tiresome, and very objectionable.