Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
That's the difference between spam and ordinary junk mail - the spammers can eat up resources without having to pay for it.

What's needed is a means by which they can be forced to pay for it. If we pass legislation which enables the restriction of email in general - even as an unintended consequence - we are going to regret it.

Consequently, I'd rather see this handled as a civil matter involving loss of revenue. The Government needs to use its authority to assist ISPs and others in suing spammers to recover lost revenues, etc. - whether they're foreign or domestic. (The U.S. government without question has enough influence with foreign governments to force them to go after spammers outside our borders - if it wants to use it).

But don't expect the rocket scientists in Clowngress to understand any of that (or even care). They'll just seize the opportunity to legislate to expand the power of government to regulate, no matter where, or why - and no matter what the unintended consequences.

9 posted on 11/22/2003 10:25:29 PM PST by fire_eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: fire_eye
I don't think you can extradite over civil, that to me is the best reason to handle it as theft and make it criminal. Also suits aren't as cool as people think, it can be pretty easy to avoid paying a settlement especially if you've been careful in your incorporation paperwork. Jail's a lot harder to avoid even with spiffy paperwork.
11 posted on 11/22/2003 10:34:30 PM PST by discostu (You figure that's gotta be jelly cos jam just don't shake like that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson