How is opposing more spending via a $15 billion bond doing the "Dems' dirty work?"
"Politics makes strange bedfellows," or so it's been said. The Dems oppose the bond because they want higher taxes and no spending cuts. McClintock opposes the bond because he wants more cuts and lower taxes.
Should we conclude, since they both oppose the bond, that the Democrats are doing McClintock's dirty work?
Or, should we conclude, since a bond allows more spending, that Arhnold is doing the Democrats' dirty work?
Can't it be a sincere difference of opinion?
