Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion
Sure, let's bring CA to a screeching halt, and not accomplish anything, right? That would be the net effect.

Strawman argument. I propsed line-item vetos for all of the non-essential items. We should fund the emergency services, mandated education, and the like, but cut the pork-barrel stuff that is only there so Jackie Goldberg can get votes.

Then you force the Dems to try to override the veto on the extravagencies, using Arnold's starpower to shine publicity on them while they do it.

You are in debt so Jackie can pass out free condoms in bars in West Hollywood. You want to vote in a bond, so she can continue the program.

69 posted on 11/20/2003 10:39:04 AM PST by LexBaird (Tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: LexBaird
See my post 68. Arnold is planning drastic budget cuts, but he is doing it the right way: by action, not by useless rhetoric, like some people, whose name starts with McC.
72 posted on 11/20/2003 10:40:54 AM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson