Skip to comments.
The JFK obsession: 40 years and still going strong
Oak Lawn (IL) Reporter ^
| 11/20/03
| Michael M. Bates
Posted on 11/18/2003 7:54:34 AM PST by mikeb704
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
I should look on the bright side. More TV time devoted to John Kennedy means less time spent on Scott Peterson.
1
posted on
11/18/2003 7:54:37 AM PST
by
mikeb704
To: mikeb704
or kobe bryant
2
posted on
11/18/2003 7:55:49 AM PST
by
bonesmccoy
(Defeat the terrorists... Vaccinate!)
To: mikeb704
The day Kennedy was inaugurated, there were a few hundred American soldiers in a far off place called Vietnam. By the time he died, there were almost 20,000, with more on orders to go there.
Didn't Kennedy want to stop the Vietnam engagement ?
3
posted on
11/18/2003 7:58:45 AM PST
by
Truth666
To: mikeb704
Media's still going on about that dead boot-leggers kid huh...oh well.
To: Truth666
Didn't Kennedy want to stop the Vietnam engagement ? Sure. After winning.
5
posted on
11/18/2003 8:11:03 AM PST
by
mlo
To: mikeb704
All this JFK saturation on the tube has led me to come to a personal observation about his wife that I never hear comment on: she appears to have been a vapid armpiece.
All of this would be in the pre-assassination accounts. I wasn't alive then, so was that a prevalent thought among people, or is it just me?
And as for post-assassination Jackie: remarkably ostentatious gold-digger. I hear people say "Onassis was the only man who could protect her children, with his wealth etc." That's nonsense. It appears the myth-making machine created a saint from whole cloth.
Can anyone imagine if a modern Republican had such a bimbo for a wife. Would the ridicule ever cease?
6
posted on
11/18/2003 8:21:04 AM PST
by
Mr. Bird
To: mikeb704
----Maybe when were all finally gone the obsession will diminish.----
As a Gen-X'er who's never been able to hear the word "Camelot" without projectile-puking, I sure as hell hope so.
-Dan
To: mikeb704
8
posted on
11/18/2003 8:29:46 AM PST
by
SerpentDove
(www.neatophotos.com)
To: mikeb704
Simple answer for the obsession - single bullet theory is untenable. Leads directly to second shooter possiblity. Therefore conspiracy.
9
posted on
11/18/2003 8:36:21 AM PST
by
JmyBryan
To: mikeb704
Simple answer for the obsession - single bullet theory is untenable. Leads directly to second shooter possiblity. Therefore conspiracy.
10
posted on
11/18/2003 8:36:29 AM PST
by
JmyBryan
To: Mr. Bird
I wasn't alive then, so was that a prevalent thought among people, or is it just me? I was alive then and my thoughts were not the same as yours. I would have said "colorless antimacassar" rather than "vapid armpiece."
11
posted on
11/18/2003 8:40:39 AM PST
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: mikeb704; All
I should look on the bright side. More TV time devoted to John Kennedy means less time spent on Scott Peterson.History Channel this week..."The Men Who Killed Kennedy---The Final Chapter"
We have been paying for that "Oswald Acted Alone" lie for 40 years.
It has distorted our "Politics", allowed the Free Traitors to steal us blind while we carry out the Left-Right Kubuki Dance it set in motion.
12
posted on
11/18/2003 8:52:23 AM PST
by
Lael
(Bush to Middle Class: Send your kids to DIE in Iraq while I send your LIVELIHOODS to INDIA!)
To: mikeb704
As I say: "He's Dead! Deal With it! Move on! I don't need to know how old he's be today if only... that's just flagellation. He's not and never was a friggin' deity. He's Dead."
Now, back to our program...
13
posted on
11/18/2003 8:55:42 AM PST
by
theDentist
(Liberals can sugarcoat sh** all they want. I'm not biting.)
To: Lael
Sorry, chum, but Oswald did act alone. The single bullet theory is not untenable, as something as simple as the oblong scar in Connelly's back shows the bullet was tumbling after hitting JFK. This is of course NEVER mentioned by the conspiracy freaks, who can't sell as many books telling the truth. There's a whole host of FACTS that get conveniently overlooked but again there's not much profit in a series of Case Closed books.
To: JmyBryan
Nellie Connally has been telling the world this week that she and hubby were convinced that John Connally was hit in the back by a different bullet than the one that hit J.F.K. Bye Bye single bullet theory, hello second shooter, buy a clue Arlen.
15
posted on
11/18/2003 9:02:14 AM PST
by
MAWG
To: SoCal Pubbie
The wound in JFKs back did not exit his neck. The wound in his throat was small and described by the emergency room nurse and doctor as an entry wound. Nellie describes seeing JFK react to the throat wound BEFORE her husband was hit in the back. Those are facts.
16
posted on
11/18/2003 9:09:38 AM PST
by
MAWG
To: MAWG
I saw something this weekend that stated that Mrs. Connolly had the governor's clothes dry-cleaned right after the shooting, washing away evidence. Was she actually that stupid?
17
posted on
11/18/2003 9:17:07 AM PST
by
Mr. Bird
To: Lael
History Channel this week..."The Men Who Killed Kennedy---The Final Chapter" Have just watched last night, for the first time. Highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in the damage these lies have done to our country for 40 years.
The program runs 6 more times this week on History Channel, including twice tonight.
Who was responsible for JFK's death? Case closed for me.
LBJ reportedly once said, won't people be surprised when they find out some day what really happened and who did this...Now I know what he meant by that cryptic comment.
To: Flux Capacitor
"Camelot...Camelot...Camelot...Camelot..."
19
posted on
11/18/2003 9:25:06 AM PST
by
Dr. Eckleburg
(There are very few shades of gray.)
To: Dr. Eckleburg
Came a lot...came a lot...came a lot...came a lot...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson