Skip to comments.
Jerusalem Post Owners Resign; Face Corruption Charges
Israel News Agency ^
| November 18, 2003
| Associated Press
Posted on 11/17/2003 11:06:43 PM PST by IsraelBeach
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: Alouette
The Jerusalem Post really put a spin on events today - the headline read: "Hollinger's Black, Radler quit"
It sounds like they were only doing there jobs but something was wrong with their salary, work conditions or were given tuna sandwiches rather than lobster.
The head should have read: "Hollinger's Black, Radler Removed for Embezzlement"
The Jerusalem Post goes on to quote Tom Rose: "This will not affect our business," said Post publisher Tom Rose. "We (Jerusalem Post)remain committed to serving our readers and our advertisers, just as we have for the past 70 years."
The Rose / Stephen's arrogance reaches a new high as if they were the new owners! The paper could be closed as of tomorrow - but I doubt it. A new owner and new managment will be found for the Jerusalem Post - you can be sure of that.
To: yonif; SJackson; mrustow
ping
22
posted on
11/18/2003 8:30:04 AM PST
by
jonatron
To: Yehuda
Are you putting together a "best of" of my posts? :-D
23
posted on
11/18/2003 9:10:39 AM PST
by
Texaggie79
(Did I just say that?)
Comment #24 Removed by Moderator
To: Alouette
There is treachery about..
To: Alouette
First Arutz Sheva is shut down, now the Jerusalem Post. Things that make you go "hmmmm"I never even dreamed The Jerusalem Post was rightwing!
26
posted on
11/18/2003 11:38:54 AM PST
by
Zionist Conspirator
("Palaeoconservatives" are national relativists.)
To: IsraelBeach
Yes, but by whom? Radler could buy the paper which would mean that nothing really changes. Or perhaps Maariv will buy it which will probably mean firing the entire company, selling the land and Maariv translating their own paper just like Haaretz do. Haaretz have proven that this model works so why not?
The best hope is a company like the NY Times buying it but that seems unlinkely
27
posted on
11/18/2003 11:50:50 AM PST
by
thegabai
To: Alouette
First Arutz Sheva is shut down, now the Jerusalem Post. Things that make you go "hmmmm" Indeed, if the liberals can not win by vote, they will enforce there views by force. They will go as far as they can legaly, then open up with illegal ploys. When that runs out they will begin to kill people.
History repeats itself, Its a Hilter/Mao/Stalin thing...
28
posted on
11/18/2003 12:05:11 PM PST
by
American in Israel
(A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
To: Zionist Conspirator
I never even dreamed The Jerusalem Post was rightwing! It is certainly rightwing when compared with Ha'aretz.
Even the New York Times is rightwing compared with Ha'aretz.
29
posted on
11/18/2003 12:22:44 PM PST
by
Alouette
(My son, the Learned Elder of Zion)
To: Alouette
As a former editor at the Jerusalem Post, I can say without any doubt that the Post is a conservative, right wing newspaper.
Although many at the Post would not embrace Kahane, the paper was the first mainstream Israeli publication to call openly for Arafat's death in a recent editorial. You will not find support for Gush Shalom, the ISM or other so-called "idealists" / "peace activists" who serve to demoralize our nation, provide hope and haven to the enemy and threaten the very existence of the State of Israel.
You will find liberal, sympathetic views expressed when it comes to unemployment and the disabled.
You will find NO pity for those involved in 32 million dollars worth of corruption at Hollinger & Co. and you will find many staff at the Jerusalem Post who will ask: "what did Tom Rose and Bret Stephens receive from Hollinger or Radler that was not authorized by the shareholders?"
To: Alouette
It is certainly rightwing when compared with Ha'aretz. Even the New York Times is rightwing compared with Ha'aretz.
Then they should change their name. Unless their referring to some other 'aretz.
Maybe their name refers to "mother earth?"
31
posted on
11/18/2003 4:25:57 PM PST
by
Zionist Conspirator
("Palaeoconservatives" are national relativists.)
To: Zionist Conspirator
Then they should change their name. Am Ha'aretz would be a good and accurate name.
32
posted on
11/18/2003 4:33:52 PM PST
by
Alouette
(My son, the Learned Elder of Zion)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson