To: republicofdavis
Oh, I didn't compare the Beatles' lyrics to Boston's. The lack of lyrical depth was Boston's weakness, but their album is full of recognizable songs and distinguishable music.
To: AmishDude
"Oh, I didn't compare the Beatles' lyrics to Boston's. The lack of lyrical depth was Boston's weakness, but their album is full of recognizable songs and distinguishable music."
Hold on now. You said that Boston was the greatest album of all time and in the same post said that the Beatles lyrics sucked. Now you're saying that lack of lyrical depth is a Boston weakness. Yet it's still the greatest album of all time. I guess lyrics don't matter that much to you. So what are you picking on the Beatles for?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson