Skip to comments.
Richard Dawkins' lecture series: "The Science of Religion and the Religion of Science.
Harvard University Gazette ^
| 13 November 2003
| Ken Gewertz, Harvard News Office
Posted on 11/15/2003 3:51:38 PM PST by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Everybody be nice.
To: *crevo_list; VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Scully; LogicWings; ...
PING. [This ping list is for the evolution side of evolution threads, and sometimes for other science topics. FReepmail me to be added or dropped.]
2
posted on
11/15/2003 3:52:31 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
To: PatrickHenry
Sounds like ole Dawkins can make up his mind...Oh, the foolishness of mankind.
An explosion from nothing, real sound theory you evolutionist have there.
To: PatrickHenry
I don't believe a thing he says.
4
posted on
11/15/2003 4:00:20 PM PST
by
South40
(My vote helped defeat cruz bustamante; did yours?)
To: South40
I don't believe in evolution, but I can tell you this, it sure looks like that TIE evolved from some ugly fabric genes!
To: South40
You are a wee bit confused. Your pic is of some game show guy named Richard Dawson, and it comes from this website:
Game Shows. I hope the remainder of your postings will be more informative.
6
posted on
11/15/2003 4:07:37 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
To: South40
This is Richard Dawkins:
7
posted on
11/15/2003 4:11:10 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
To: PatrickHenry
It was a joke!
8
posted on
11/15/2003 4:13:31 PM PST
by
South40
(My vote helped defeat cruz bustamante; did yours?)
To: South40; PatrickHenry
Can you two families stop feuding?
9
posted on
11/15/2003 4:17:01 PM PST
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: PatrickHenry
"But at the same time as I support Darwinism as a scientist, I am a passionate anti-Darwinian when it comes to politics and how we should conduct our human affairs."Gosh, how ever did meaningless evolution produce such an attitude?
To: PatrickHenry
Having demolished its evidential basis With a subordinate clause, that is.
11
posted on
11/15/2003 4:20:16 PM PST
by
cornelis
To: PatrickHenry
Actually...I think they're the same guy.
12
posted on
11/15/2003 4:32:08 PM PST
by
South40
(My vote helped defeat cruz bustamante; did yours?)
To: PatrickHenry
"I do think - and this is what my second lecture will be about - that there is something quasireligious in science, the sense of awe, the sense of wonder, the sense of almost spiritual response to the universe, which I believe I have and many other scientists have developed to a high degree, but I would resist confusing that with the supernatural."
Nature is quite experienced in shock and awe.
13
posted on
11/15/2003 4:34:05 PM PST
by
visualops
(Freedom is worth fighting for,dying for, and standing for- the advance of freedom leads to peace-GWB)
To: Doctor Stochastic
Can you two families stop feuding?LOL!
14
posted on
11/15/2003 5:06:10 PM PST
by
jennyp
(http://crevo.bestmessageboard.com)
To: South40
Actually...I think they're the same guy. Can't you tell? Richard Dawkins' brain is bigger.
15
posted on
11/15/2003 5:07:40 PM PST
by
jennyp
(http://crevo.bestmessageboard.com)
To: PatrickHenry
In an essay on the events of Sept. 11, 2001, "A Time to Stand Up," he calls religion "the most inflammatory enemy-labeling device in history,"...Is he talking about anybody we know?
To: jennyp
Here's some material on
Richard Dinkins. I expect this pic to appear soon on creationist websites, whenever Richard Dawkins is mentioned. Or the talk show guy's pic. Anything but a true pic. Ain't creation science wonderful?
17
posted on
11/15/2003 5:17:54 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
To: jennyp
Ah. Found another pic for the creationists to use:
Richard Dworkin. "Creationism is never having to say you're sorry."
18
posted on
11/15/2003 5:29:42 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
To: jennyp
One more, then I'll quit. "Creation research" is great stuff. This is
Richard Hawkins:
19
posted on
11/15/2003 5:34:52 PM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
To: PatrickHenry
And then there's the Stephen Jay Gould / Steven J. Gold business. The latter is a Marxist political writer. The former is an evolutionary theorist, perhaps a bit lefty in his politics, but who seldom if ever wrote about politics. Some creationists really like to confuse those two for the purposes of dismissing Gould as a communist.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson