Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: joyful1
An al-Qaida representative bought enriched uranium capable of being used in a so-called dirty bomb from the Congolese opposition in 2000, according to a French newspaper report.

Point 1. Enriched Uranium wouldn't make much of a dirty bomb. It's simply not that dirty. A real dirty bomb would be made with fission by-products like colbolt 60 etc. That stuff is hot, hot, hot, while you could take a nap in enriched uranium and not be harmed.

Point 2. Where in the hell would the Congo get the ability to enrich uranium? Maybe the author is confusing enrichment with refining (i.e. yellow cake) but actual enrichment is way way beyond the capability of the Congo.

Bottom line. This story is bunk.

10 posted on 11/14/2003 9:09:32 AM PST by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Ditto
I think the story is bunk too. Maybe the terrorists bought some anyway thinking they had the good stuff. They wouldn't be that stupid would they?
22 posted on 11/14/2003 9:23:22 AM PST by Lee Heggy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Ditto
Bottom line. This story is bunk.

Exactly. Both isotopes have low specific activity. Plenty of people worked at the Hanford Reservation, etc. and are just fine.

29 posted on 11/14/2003 10:22:56 AM PST by Gorzaloon (Contents may have settled during shipping, but this tagline contains the stated product weight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson