Skip to comments.
Bush Lied?
SAS ^
| 11/11/03
Posted on 11/11/2003 6:45:53 AM PST by pabianice
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: pabianice
BUMP! The Repubs should read these quotes on the floor of the Senate during the "filibuster" tomorrow!!!
21
posted on
11/11/2003 9:10:50 AM PST
by
jmstein7
To: B4Ranch
Truths like that are independeint in their own sphere. That statement still stands, whether the people own up to it or not.
I pray we will once again own up to it. In Klamath, at Jarbidge, during the vote counts in Florida and elsewhere we have examples of people doing just that. It can and should spread over the length and breadth of this nation.
Best regards my friend.
To: JohnGalt
I agree; everyone in Washington DC is a liar.
BUMP! Blackbird.
To: cgk
XXX-42 misspoke. Clinton meant to refer to the Branch Davidians and all the other Christians with guns in their homes.
Not one member of the politial elite has compared the Clintonazi BATF/FBI-HRT slaughter at Waco to Bush's alledged "war crimes" in Iraq; see the Clinton's 1993 known full-auto and gunship attack on a church home filled with some 142 men, women, and children followed by 6 weeks of torture and poison gas, defined by US law as torture and illegal use of tanks rolling in and over the church home.
The Clintons' message was as clear as islam's: Submit or die. ...and as we're hearing from George Soros and others, the Born-Again Christian Bush's message...who must be defeated at all costs november 2004.
If that Branch Davidian church home had been a Jewish cult's temple home or muslims' mosque home, refusing to submit to the same new-to-the-Oval Office-needing-to-demonstrate-his-and-her-police powers US government JBT forces which had committed an armed assault on full auto, do you think that their "bretheren" would have allowed Clintonazis or even our government a peaceful life?
Jews would have written articles of condemnation and their politicians express concern. Muslims would have declared a fatwa as thousands joined jihad. Christians only demanded a TWA Flight 800 investigation.
Clinton only misspoke about Sadamn's Iraq while thinking about the real risk to his USSA.
24
posted on
11/11/2003 9:45:01 AM PST
by
SevenDaysInMay
(Federal judges and justices serve for periods of good behavior, not life. Article III sec. 1)
To: SevenDaysInMay
illegal use of tanks rolling in and over the church home\ I read on FR that those tanks were Wesley Clark's.
25
posted on
11/11/2003 11:01:55 AM PST
by
cgk
(Kraut, 1989: We must brace ourselves for disquisitions on peer pressure, adolescent anomie & rage.)
To: pabianice
One minute they're calling Bush dumb, the next they're claiming that which, even they would have to admit, would be a brilliant con job if it were true that he lied.
To: pabianice
Bump
To: pabianice
But if the inspectors are not permitted to visit suspect sites or monitor compliance at known production facilities, they may as well be in Baltimore, not Baghdad. That would open a window of opportunity for Iraq to rebuild its arsenal of weapons and delivery systems in months -- I say again, in months -- not years. A failure to respond could embolden Saddam to act recklessly, signalling to him that he can with impunity develop these weapons of mass destruction or threaten his neighbors, and this is very important in an age when we look forward to weapons of mass destruction being a significant threat to civilized people everywhere. And it would permanently damage the credibility of the United Nations Security Council to act as a force for promoting international peace and security. We continue to hope, indeed pray, that Saddam will comply, but we must be prepared to act if he does not. - President Clinton in remarks at Arlington Cemetery, Nov. 11, 1998.
http://www.fas.org/news/iraq/1998/11/11/981111-wh1.htm
28
posted on
11/11/2003 1:13:35 PM PST
by
jackbill
To: pabianice
Don't bother me with the facts. Bush is a liar and the worst president we have ever had. I hate him, I hate him, I hate him, I hate him..... (sarcasm off)
29
posted on
11/11/2003 1:16:24 PM PST
by
TaxMe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson