Skip to comments.
Democrats plot using war intel against Bush
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| Wednesday, November 5, 2003
Posted on 11/04/2003 10:58:22 PM PST by JohnHuang2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
To: JohnHuang2
Wow. To get Roberts pissed off, you know it's bad.
41
posted on
11/05/2003 6:33:32 AM PST
by
rwfromkansas
("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
To: RandallFlagg
That would be AWESOME... Too bad it won't happen. But just imagining it is enough to bring a smile to my face.
BTW... Is that your real name or is that from SK's "The Stand"?
To: nuffsenuff
"The Canary Trap" as formulated by John Patrick Ryan.
43
posted on
11/05/2003 6:40:30 AM PST
by
wordsofearnest
(He'll rip your lungs out Jim, I'd like to meet his tailor.)
To: JohnHuang2
Don't forget the "Mission Accomplished" banner. That story makes me so sick. Last night CNBC kept using the word -- so and so blames it on... My question is what is their intention? To say the mission was not accomplished? How many soldier died in Japan or Germany after they were defeated? Oh my GOD!?!? WE NEVER WON WWII!!! WE'RE STILL AT WAR PEOPLE!!!
44
posted on
11/05/2003 6:47:40 AM PST
by
Naspino
(I am in no way associated with the views expressed in your posts.)
To: Naspino
That ticks me off too...
They use the word "blame" like if putting the banner up was bad...
They should be saying "credited"... since there was nothing wrong with putting the banner up. The ship's crew mission WAS accomplished and they were coming home.
I hate liberals.
To: JohnHuang2
He'll be facing criminal charges before that.
When does WV's Governor come up for election?
To: Dog
Colmes was freaked about it last night as well.
To: nwrep
Shall I spell it out for you?
They are on a fishing expedition (admitting they don't know what they will find) with the clear intent of using the information to HURT THE LEADER OF OUR COUNTRY!
Calling for IC is only used to sort out high crimes and misdemeaners - IMPEACHMENT!
This was a consistent plan to impeach Bush with anything they could get their hands on, and they understood they could only call for it once, so make it good - election time.
To: JohnHuang2
A lot of excitement about very little.
1. We don't know the source of even if it's authentic,
2. The Dems can easily turn it around and claim it's probably part of a WH dirty tricks op to help in their stonewalling effort on intel investigation.
3. People don't understand it --hedci, I don't undertans it.
4, There is no evidence of any intel being compromised.
I don't think this will fly.
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
No, it wouldn't.
This was put down in writing - a little different than hearsay and verbal.
This is clear.
Ashcroft should pull the servers, phone records, and visitors logs immediately. My money's not on this being from Rockefeller at all. He isn't going to take a dive for the real culprit behind it. Put his feet to the fire and this story will spread to UNELECTED EX-PUTZ CLINTON, GORE, AND MCAULIFFE USING MONEY AND INFLUENCE TO CONTROL THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES.
To: cookcounty
Reread today's news - Rockefeller admitted it was his.
To: cookcounty
Reread today's news - Rockefeller admitted it was from his office, and admitted it was a draft.
To: RandallFlagg
Good thought, walkin' dude.
53
posted on
11/05/2003 7:04:02 AM PST
by
freedomson
(Baruch haba b'shem Adonai!)
To: cookcounty
Reread today's news - Rockefeller admitted it was from his office, and admitted it was a draft.
He also quoted extensively from it - seems he didn't know Fox News already read it before he started repeating it - verbatim.
To: 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
"I'm only concerened with the klintoons and reno being investigated for their crimes " We'd be wise to widen our scope
To: cookcounty
1. We don't know the source of even if it's authentic,We know it was from Rockefeller's office - he had not denied that.
2. The Dems can easily turn it around and claim it's probably part of a WH dirty tricks op to help in their stonewalling effort on intel investigation.
We know it was from Rockefeller's office - he had not denied that.
nuff said
56
posted on
11/05/2003 7:53:04 AM PST
by
mathluv
To: mathluv
I said what?
:-)
To: Eowyn-of-Rohan
That is silly. Whatever happened at Watergate did not intentionally aid and help our overseas enemies. Plus, the president was a Republican so you are comparing apples and oranges. You need to show that the Republicans tried to aid the Japanese or Germans in WWII, or the Germans in WWI or the Russians during Kennedy's term or something like this, to equate what the Rats are doing. I don't wish you luck, because I pray that no one was that traitorous.
Free Atl
To: nuffsenuff
LOL!!!
59
posted on
11/05/2003 8:13:45 AM PST
by
mathluv
To: Little Pig
John Edwards Nice to see my esteemed senator hard at work. Is that why he's missed most of the votes this year?
60
posted on
11/05/2003 8:25:19 AM PST
by
Carolina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson