[dead]

Screw Greenpeace. I'll take Ashcroft.

Don’t bitch when Hillary’s president and Andrew Cuomo’s the AG selectively enforcing sailor mongering laws on abortion protestors or the NRA.

[TheBigB]

Don’t bitch when Hillary’s president and Andrew Cuomo’s the AG selectively enforcing sailor mongering laws on abortion protestors or the NRA.

Since neither of those will ever happen, I will have no opportunity to bitch. Thanks anyhoo.

[Prime Choice]

Don’t bitch when Hillary’s president and Andrew Cuomo’s the AG selectively enforcing sailor mongering laws on abortion protestors or the NRA.

Y'mean like Janet Reno did under Clinton?

[Abe Froman]

I fail to see why they are't being charged with piracy.

I won't shed a tear to see Greenpeace lose their tax-exempt status. Perhaps if the American Left gets a taste of tyranny they'll find the Right's objections to their interpretation of select Constitutional Amendments out of existence more relevant.

[TexasCajun]

Don’t bitch when Hillary’s president and Andrew Cuomo’s the AG selectively enforcing sailor mongering laws on abortion protestors or the NRA.

Please, don't even joke about that, I'll have nightmares.

[donozark]

Turley is the same lawyer who accused AG Ashcroft of building "internment camps."

[cksharks]

Where the f--- you been? The bitch did that already.Or is it convenint for you to forget the litttle RICO incident.

[Behind Liberal Lines]

Don’t bitch when Hillary’s president and Andrew Cuomo’s the AG selectively enforcing sailor mongering laws on abortion protestors or the NRA.

Which they would no doubt attempt regardless of what Ashcroft does or does not do.

I seem to recall Janet Reno rather cavalierly acting when it suited the Clintons' needs (Waco, Elian), regardless of the constitution, and without Ashcroft "to show the way."

That does mean I think two wrongs equal a right. It just means that I'm not so sure this is a wrong on Ashcroft's part to begin with.

[Spok]

It's already been done. Clinton used the Secret Service and IRS to audit and intimidate his critics. And the RICO law was used against the pro-life movement, although that abuse was recognized and reversed on appeal. The environmentalists (although not Greenpeace in particular)have decided that the taking of private property and human life is justified in the name of their cause. I don't agree with Ashcroft's approach, but as far as I'm concerned, the environmentalist movement is morphing into a serious terrorist threat that deserves serious attention. And if and when the left is in power again, we can expect no quarter, whether we've given it or not.