To: pabianice
It's becoming quite clear that Europeans were here first. Asians followed and either murdered the Europeans' descendants to extinction or overwhelmed them
There was no such thing as European/Asia at that time. The Solutrean groups/ Cro Magnon groups would be related to the Middle Eastern, Indian groups who are SEmitic, Indo-Aryan. The Native 'mericans in North America seem quite related to Mongoloid groups but those in the South, well...
Europe isn't really a continent even in terms of culture with culture being divided in a big swathe from India, through Persia through anatolia to Spain (the Aryanic group) and the Semitic and hamitic (Egypt, Ethiopia) groups in the Mid East being in cotnact right since 4000BC. The Far East (China, Japan, Korea) seem to be in a different cultural zone.
The NAtive AMericans may well have been a mingling of groups from the East and the West of Eurasia, since, though they do have the characteristics of Mongoloids, certain southern Americans show some similarities to the Caucasian groups.
THe anti-white prejudice is stupid since 'whiteness' doesn't relate to race, as, if we consider Aryans purely to be whites, then Slavs aren't white and Persians, Indians, should be considered white.
26 posted on
11/03/2003 8:06:06 AM PST by
Cronos
(W2004)
To: Cronos
"The Far East (China, Japan, Korea) seem to be in a different cultural zone." Haven't you overlooked the Jomon and Ainu groups? (...and more recently (2-4,000 years ago) the Xiongnu, Han and Hakka Chinese)
27 posted on
11/03/2003 11:38:13 AM PST by
blam
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson