To: daylate-dollarshort
Show how, then, there was more proof here than the criminal conviction standard of "beyond a reasonable doubt"? I'm waiting.
To: daylate-dollarshort; drlevy88
Or even an equal amount of proof. Hint: the civil court does not require this degree of proof in the first place so OF COURSE such degree of proof was not established. If Terri's alleged statements were hypothetical crimes calling for the death penalty, the testimony regarding them would have been shredded to smithereens by the defense attorneys, if not altogether laughed out of the court.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson